Abstract
In the rituximab era, the optimal treatment modality for primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PG-DLBCL) still remains unclear. We performed a retrospective, multicenter analysis of 65 patients with PG-DLBCL to assess the efficacy and toxicity of the addition of rituximab to conventional chemotherapy. When compared with conventional chemotherapy, there was a trend that rituximab plus chemotherapy yielded a higher complete response rate, 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rate and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate, but this was not statistically significant. In subgroup analysis, better OS was observed only for patients with advanced-stage disease when rituximab was added. When involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) was included, EFS and OS were significantly prolonged in the conventional chemotherapy group, but not in the immunochemotherapy group. If focusing on patients with localized-stage disease receiving immunochemotherapy, the efficacies of short-course rituximab (R)-chemotherapy plus IFRT and 6–8 courses of R-chemotherapy without IFRT were comparable. In conclusion, it is necessary to carry out prospective randomized trials to help further illuminate the role of rituximab in the PG-DLBCL treatment landscape. If a patient has been treated with a non-rituximab-containing regimen, additional IFRT should be considered, and for patients with advanced-stage disease, rituximab should be considered.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81101499), Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (11ZR1407600) and Fudan University Science Foundation for Young Scholars (09FQ76).
Potential conflict of interest
Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at www.informahealthcare.com/lal.