Carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan versus a newly designed intravenous busulfan-based Busulfex, etoposide and melphalan conditioning regimen for autologous hematopoietic cell transplant: a retrospective matched-pair analysis in advanced Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas

Abstract

Optimal conditioning remains a challenge in lymphomas. We designed a regimen consisting of Busulfex, etoposide and melphalan (BuEM). We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of patients conditioned with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan (BEAM) or BuEM in matched-pair analysis on a planned 2:1 ratio. Eighty-seven patients treated with BEAM who fulfilled the matching criteria were randomly selected. Two-year progression-free survival/overall survival (PFS/OS) were 63.2%/76.7% for BEAM vs. 65.6%/79.8% for BuEM after 64.7 and 42.7 months, respectively. Furthermore, marginally better PFS and OS were noted in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) after BuEM. In multivariate analysis, PFS was superior in HL, chemosensitive disease and complete remission post-transplant. BEAM correlated with faster engraftment, reduced infections, less mucositis and liver toxicity, and BuEM with less need for blood cell and platelet transfusions and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration. In conclusion, BuEM was well tolerated and equally highly efficacious as BEAM for non-Hodgkin lymphoma and offered marginally significantly improved PFS and OS in HL with acceptable toxicity and zero mortality.

Keywords::

• Autologous hematopoietic cell transplant
• lymphoma
• conditioning regimen
• busulfan

Potential conflict of interest

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at www.informahealthcare.com/lal.