190
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Focus on Prehospital Providers

Occupational Health and Safety Assessment of Exposure to Jet Fuel Combustion Products in Air Medical Transport

, MD, MPH, , BSc, , , MEng &
Pages 202-208 | Received 08 May 2009, Accepted 23 Sep 2009, Published online: 03 Mar 2010
 

Abstract

Introduction. Transport medicine personnel are potentially exposed to jet fuel combustion products. Setting-specific data are required to determine whether this poses a risk. Objective. This study assessed exposure to jet fuel combustion products, compared various engine ignition scenarios, and determined methods to minimize exposure. Methods. The Beechcraft King Air B200 turboprop aircraft equipped with twin turbine engines, using a kerosene-based jet fuel (Jet A-1), was used to measure products of combustion during boarding, engine startup, and flight in three separate engine start scenarios (“shielded”: internal engine start, door closed; “exposed”: ground power unit start, door open; and “minimized”: ground power unit right engine start, door open). Real-time continuous monitoring equipment was used for oxygen, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, sulfur dioxide, volatile organic compounds, and particulate matter. Integrated methods were used for aldehydes, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, and aliphatic hydrocarbons. Samples were taken in the paramedic breathing zone for approximately 60 minutes, starting just before the paramedics boarded the aircraft. Data were compared against regulated time-weighted exposure thresholds to determine the presence of potentially harmful products of combustion. Results. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, aldehydes, volatile organic compounds, and aliphatic hydrocarbons were found at very low concentrations or beneath the limits of detection. There were significant differences in exposures to particulates, carbon monoxide, and total volatile organic compound between the “exposed” and “minimized” scenarios. Elevated concentrations of carbon monoxide and total volatile organic compounds were present during the ground power unit–assisted dual-engine start. There were no appreciable exposures during the “minimized” or “shielded” scenarios. Conclusion. Air medical personnel exposures to jet fuel combustion products were generally low and did not exceed established U.S. or Canadian health and safety exposure limits. Avoidance of ground power unit–assisted dual-engine starts and closing the hangar door prior to start minimize or eliminate the occupational exposure.

The authors wish to thank flight paramedics and pilots at Ornge Transport Medicine for enabling this investigation to occur. The authors also thank Dr. Chris Mazza, President and Chief Executive Officer, and the Board of Directors of Ornge Transport Medicine for their support of this and other ongoing research initiatives pertinent to safety in transport medicine.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.