Agreement Between Occupational Therapists and Clients with Stroke on Three Outcome Measures

Abstract

In recent years, the occupational therapy profession has been under increased pressure to document the outcomes of interventions in order 10 improve the quality of client care and to provide evidence of the effectiveness and efficiency of services to recipients and sponsors. The literature to date has focused primarily on establishing therapy outcomes from a therapist perspective. However, attention must also be paid to the views of our consumers regarding the outcomes of therapy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether clients and therapists agree regarding client scores on three outcome measures. The study included 4 occupational therapists and 20 clients with stroke who rated clients' status in terms of personal activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living and quality of life, at admission of clients as well as discharge from rehabilitation. The results indicated that there was generally only moderate agreement between therapists' and clients' ratings at both admission and discharge. These findings suggest that therapists should continue to spend time exploring client status with their clients so that both parties have the best possible understanding of the clients' capabilities, and the outcome of therapy. The findings also suggest the need to administer client outcome assessments as well as to utilize client self-reports.

Key Words:

• instrumental activities of daily living
• personal activities of daily living
• quality of life
• self-report assessment