![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
We compared the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery with those of laparotomy in second-look operations for ovarian cancer. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 35 patients treated between January 2000 and December 2005. They were categorized into two groups: Laparoscopy versus laparotomy group. Among 35 patients, 18 patients (51.4%) were treated with laparoscopy, and 17 patients (48.6%) were treated with laparotomy. There were no statistically significant differences except for hospital stay (laparoscopy vs. laparotomy five days vs. nine days, p < 0.05). Eight patients (44.4%) in the laparoscopy group and six (35.3%) in the laparotomy group were found to be pathologically positive after the second look operation. There were two recurrences (20.0%) in the laparoscopy group and four (36.4%) in the laparotomy group pathologically negative in the second-look operation (p = 0.557). There were no differences in disease-free survival rates (p = 0.705) between the two groups. The second look operation is an ideal method for histologic comfirmation of recurrent or persistent ovarian cancer. Laparoscopic surgery seems a safe and accurate method for the second-look examination, and can also reduce patient discomfort, hospital stay and morbidity associated with laparotomy.
Key words::
Declaration of interest: The authors have no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.