3
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

If endopyelotomy works, why not ‘exopyelotomy’?

, , , &
Pages 463-466 | Published online: 10 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Summary. Endopyelotomy, performed by the percutaneous or the retrograde approach, is a safe and effective minimally invasive modality for treatment of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. However, due to a small but calculated risk of vascular and ureteral injury, the procedure may not be suitable in a certain group of patients. ‘Exopyelotomy’, a new term coined for retroperitoneoscopic endopyelotomy, appears to be a logical minimally invasive alternative in such patients. Although, our experience is limited to only four patients, the encouraging results and the simplicity of the procedure are good enough reasons for its inclusion in the armamentarium of an endoscopic surgeon. As it does not transgress the peritoneal cavity, the ureter and the renal parenchymal, theoretically, it appears to be reasonably safe.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.