42
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Screening for drug-resistant Candida yeasts with chromogenic agar

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 807-816 | Received 22 Jan 2009, Accepted 27 Nov 2009, Published online: 29 Jan 2010
 

Abstract

We examined the utility of agar dilution to screen yeasts for reduced susceptibility to several newer antifungal drugs including echinocandins and azoles. We compared agar dilution susceptibility screening with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) method for Candida isolates. We added echinocandins and azoles to CHROMagar Candida medium prior to its solidification. Assessment of resistance was based on growth characteristics, wherein decreased colony size in the presence of antifungal drugs was used as an indicator of susceptibility. Clinical Candida isolates of C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, C. guilliermondii, C. lusitaniae, C. rugosa and C. dubliniensis were screened for drug susceptibility. Overall, antifungal susceptibility of the yeasts to anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, posaconazole and voriconazole, determined using CHROMagar agar dilution, were shown to be 96, 80, 94, 90 and 97% as accurate, respectively, as those determined by the CLSI method, i.e., within one tube dilution of CLSI MICs. Categorical errors by percentage had a broader range. Major errors noted with anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin were 3, 6 and 0%, respectively, while very major errors were 15, 55 and 38%, respectively. Major errors with posaconazole and voriconazole were 12 and 0%, respectively, while very major errors were 0 and 22%, respectively, compared to CLSI standards. Most of the assessment errors were found with C. glabrata and C. parapsilosis. Agar dilution screening for drug susceptibility with the current panel of antifungal drugs is rapid, accurate and effective. However, the determination of resistance or non-susceptibility in yeasts may be more problematic, and may be species dependent.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to A. C. Vallor and M. C. Olivo, Jr. for their technical expertise in carrying out these studies.

Funding

This project was funded in part by federal funds from the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, under Contract No. NIH NIDCR 5R01-DE018096 and NIH Grant #DE14318 for the COSTAR Program.

Declarations of interest: WRK, JDZ, FPH, MJB, EB, AWF, DIM: None to declare. TFP: Research Support: Merck & Co., Pfizer Inc., and Schering-Plough Corporation, Speakers Bureau: Merck & Co., Pfizer Inc.; Consultant: Basilea, Merck & Co., Pfizer Inc., Schering- Plough Corporation, Stiefel Laboratories, and Toyoma. SWR: Research Support: Pfizer Inc., Schering-Plough Corporation, Astellas Pharma US Inc.

This paper was first published online on Early Online on 27 January 2010.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.