Comparison of the efficacy and endometrial safety of two estradiol valerate/dienogest combinations and Kliogest^® for continuous combined hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy and endometrial safety of two estradiol valerate/dienogest combinations with Kliogest^® in the treatment of postmenopausal symptoms.

Design This was a double-blind, randomized, multicenter study.

Methods Patients were randomized to estradiol valerate 2.0 mg/dienogest 2.0 mg (Climodien^®), estradiol valerate 2.0 mg/dienogest 3.0 mg (E₂Val 2/DNG 3); or estradiol 2.0 mg/estriol 1.0 mg/norethisterone acetate 1.0 mg (Kliogest^®) once daily for 1 year. The primary efficacy variable was the Kupperman index. Endometrial safety was determined primarily by biopsy.

Results and Conclusions Climodien and E₂Val 2/DNG 3 were therapeutically equivalent to Kliogest (mean changes in Kupperman index -20.1, -19.0 and -18.3, respectively). No statistically significant differences existed between treatment groups in the severity of postmenopausal symptoms. The incidences of endometrial atrophy were similar in all groups. Climodien appeared to be superior to Kliogest in terms of vaginal bleeding pattern, whereas E₂Val 2/DNG 3 was associated with a slightly higher incidence and greater intensity of vaginal bleeding. The incidences of adverse events were similar in all groups. A greater proportion of women in the Kliogest and E₂Val 2/DNG 3 groups experienced vaginal bleeding, whereas breast problems were more common with Climodien. Climodien and E₂Val 2/DNG 3 induced desirable changes in insulin-like growth factor I (decrease) and sex hormone binding globulin (increase) that were not seen with Kliogest.

Key Words:

• Climodien
• Kliogest
• Hormone Replacement Therapy
• Endometrium
• Continuous Combined HRT
• Estradiol Valerate
• Dienogest