228
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The liquid overlay technique is the key to formation of co-culture spheroids consisting of primary osteoblasts, fibroblasts and endothelial cells

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1000-1012 | Received 24 Aug 2010, Accepted 19 Apr 2011, Published online: 27 May 2011
 

Abstract

Background aims. The 3-dimensional (3-D) culture of various cell types reflects the in vivo situation more precisely than 2-dimensional (2-D) cell culture techniques. Spheroids as 3-D cell constructs have been used in tumor research for a long time. They have also been used to study angiogenic mechanisms, which are essential for the success of many tissue-engineering approaches. Several methods of forming spheroids are known, but there is a lack of systematic studies evaluating the performance of these techniques. Methods. We evaluated the performance of the hanging drop technique, carboxymethyl cellulose technique and liquid overlay technique to form both mono- and co-culture spheroids consisting of primary osteoblasts, fibroblasts and endothelial cells. The performance of the three techniques was evaluated in terms of rate of yield and reproducibility. The size of the generated spheroids was determined systematically. Results. The liquid overlay technique was the most suitable for generating spheroids reproducibly. The rate of yield for this technique was between 60% and 100% for monoculture spheroids and 100% for co-culture spheroids. The size of the spheroids could be adjusted easily and precisely by varying the number of seeded cells organized in one spheroid. The formation of co-culture spheroids consisting of three different cell types was possible. Conclusions. Our results show that the most suitable technique for forming spheroids can vary from the chosen cell type, especially if primary cells are used. Co-culture spheroids consisting of three different cell types will be used to study angiogenic phenomena in further studies.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by funding of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen Foundation (AO Foundation), Davos, Switzerland.

Disclosure of interest: No competing financial interests exist.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.