129
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Predictive factors for poor peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and peak CD34+cell count to guide pre-emptive or immediate rescue mobilization

, , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 823-829 | Received 04 Jan 2012, Accepted 21 Mar 2012, Published online: 27 Apr 2012
 

Abstract

Background aims. Failure in mobilization of peripheral blood (PB) stem cells is a frequent reason for not performing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Early identification of poor mobilizers could avoid repeated attempts at mobilization, with the administration of pre-emptive rescue mobilization. Methods. Data from the first mobilization schedule of 397 patients referred consecutively for autologous HSCT between 2000 and 2010 were collected. Poor mobilization was defined as the collection of < 2 × 106 CD34+cells/kg body weight (BW). Results. The median age was 53 years (range 4–70) and 228 (57%) were males. Diagnoses were multiple myeloma in 133 cases, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in 114, acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome in 81, Hodgkin's lymphoma in 42, solid tumors in 17 and acute lymphoblastic leukemia in 10. The mobilization regimen consisted of recombinant human granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in 346 patients (87%) and chemotherapy followed by G-CSF (C + G-CSF) in 51 (13%). Poor mobilization occurred in 105 patients (29%), without differences according to mobilization schedule. Diagnosis, previous therapy with purine analogs and three or more previous chemotherapy lines were predictive factors for poor mobilization. A CD34+cell count in PB > 13.8/μL was enough to ensure ≥ 2 × 106 CD34+cells/kg, with high sensitivity (90%) and specificity (91%). Conclusions. The prevalence of poor mobilization was high, being associated with disease type, therapy with purine analogs and multiple chemotherapy regimens. The threshold of CD34+ cell count in PB identified poor mobilizers, in whom the administration of immediate or pre-emptive plerixafor could be useful to avoid a second mobilization.

Acknowledgments

Supported in part with grants RD06/0020/1056 from RTICC, Instituto Carlos III, and P-EF 2011 from Jose Carreras Leukemia Foundation.

Disclosure of interest: Juan-Manuel Sancho and Mireia Morgades received an unrestricted grant from Genzyme.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.