Abstract
Neurosonography by advanced transvaginal sonography has revealed normal and abnormal intracranial morphology. Transvaginal 3D sonography demonstrates bony structures, multiplanar analysis of inside detailed morphology, tomographic ultrasound imaging in any cutting sections, 3D sonoangiography and volume calculation of ventricles and/or intracranial lesions. Longitudinal assessment of normal and abnormal CNS development is easy by serial scanning. However, the transvaginal approach has several limitations due to its observation by use of a high-frequency transducer from the fetal parietal region. Evaluation of the brainstem and posterior fossa, which are located far from the parietal ultrasound windows of the anterior fontanelle or sagittal suture, is sometimes hard by transvaginal sonography. Visualization of bilateral temporal areas is getting difficult with advanced gestational weeks because of bilateral acoustic shadows due to ossification of parietal bones. Demonstration of frontal/occipital areas is sometimes impossible in late pregnancy due to scan-angle limitation of the transvaginal transducer. From our experiences, the main difference between transvaginal 3D ultrasound and MRI is demonstration of the whole gyral and sulcal formation and brainstem in the late second and third trimesters. Although MRI is a useful modality which can compensate for pitfalls of transvaginal 3D ultrasound, 3D ultrasound is sometimes superior to MRI in detecting cysts in cyst and intracranial calcification. Transvaginal 3D ultrasound is much superior to MRI in detecting bony structures and angioarchitectonics and in volumetric assessment. Regarding objective and accurate prenatal diagnosis, any less-invasive modalities can be used. After considering each advantage and disadvantage of transvaginal 3D ultrasound and MR imaging, it is suggested to use the different technologies according to what is to be detected and evaluated.