183
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Pregnancy outcome following induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol for decreased fetal movements at term

, , , &
Pages 1225-1227 | Received 05 Jul 2010, Accepted 13 Mar 2011, Published online: 20 Apr 2011
 

Abstract

Objective. To determine the outcome of labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol among women with perception of persistent decrease in fetal movements at term.

Method. The study group comprising 107 women who had induction of labor at term for primary complaint of decreased fetal movements (DFM) were compared with equal number of women who had induction for prolong pregnancy in a university teaching hospital.

Results. Caesarean section rate (39.3% vs. 22.4%, P < 0.001) and birthweight less than 2500 g (11.2% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.02) were significantly higher in the DFM group with the leading indication for caesarean delivery being nonreassuring fetal heart rate. Also, the incidence of 5-min Apgar score <7 were significantly lower among women in the DFM group. However, there was no difference in neonatal unit admission. There was no case of early neonatal death in both groups of women.

Conclusion. Intravaginal misoprostol for labor induction is a safe delivery option for women with perception of DFM with reassuring nonstress test. Since all cases with persistent decrease in fetal movements had reassuring nonstress test, the reduction in fetal movements was most likely due to altered perception.

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of the Consultants and Resident Doctors of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.