370
Views
35
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Suspected versus non-suspected small-for-gestational age fetuses at term: perinatal outcomes

, , , &
Pages 938-943 | Received 09 Mar 2011, Accepted 13 Jun 2011, Published online: 16 Sep 2011
 

Abstract

Objective: To compare perinatal outcomes of suspected versus non-suspected small-for-gestational age fetuses (SGA) at term. Methods: Retrospective cohort study among all term singleton neonates with a birth weight <10th percentile born in the Parkstad region between 1 January 2006 and 3 March 2008. The subjects were assigned to a prenatally suspected or non-suspected SGA group. Primary outcome was adverse neonatal outcome at birth, defined as a composite of intrauterine fetal death, Apgar <7 at 5 min, or pH umbilical artery <7.05. Secondary outcome included neonatal medium care unit (NMCU) admission ≥7 days. Results: 430 subjects were included in the study; 36.7% was suspected of SGA. In the suspected SGA group mean gestational age at birth and birth weight were significantly lower, whereas maternal morbidity was significantly higher. The incidence of labor induction and elective cesarean section were also significantly higher in the suspected SGA group. Total perinatal mortality was 2.1%. Identification of SGA and subsequent management led to a significant decrease of adverse neonatal outcome at birth, but did not lead to a significant decrease in NMCU admission ≥7 days. Conclusions: Suspicion of SGA was associated with a more active management of labor and delivery, resulting in a better neonatal outcome at birth.

Acknowledgments

This research is part of a research-internship of the Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University. We thank the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Atrium Medical Centre Heerlen for facilitating this research. We specifically wish to thank Matthijs van der Garde and Elsje Dorssers for their help during this study.

Declaration of Interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.