540
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Early regular versus late selective poractant treatment in preterm infants born between 25 and 30 gestational weeks: a prospective randomized multicenter study

, , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 411-415 | Received 07 Mar 2013, Accepted 17 Jun 2013, Published online: 30 Jul 2013
 

Abstract

Objective: Surfactant treatment in the early hours of life significantly decreases the rates of death and air leak, and increases survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm infants. We aimed to compare the impact of early surfactant (ES) administration to late selective (LS) treatment on neonatal outcomes in preterm infants.

Methods: All preterm infants between 25 and 30 wks gestational age and who were not entubated in the delivery room and did not have any major congenital malformation or perinatal asphyxia were randomized to ES treatment (200 mg/kg Curosurf® administration in 1 hour after birth) or LS treatment (200 mg/kg Curosurf®administration in the first 6 h of life if needed). The patients were treated by nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) treatment regardless of the surfactant requirement. Outcomes were the necessity of mechanical ventilation, nCPAP duration, the oxygen requirement duration, the rates of BPD, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and mortality, and the assesment of the following situations; (pneumothorax, patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) ≥ grade III).

Results: Among 159 infants enrolled in the study, 79 were randomized to ES and 80 to LS treatment groups. Thirty-five patients (44%) in the LS treatment group needed surfactant administration. Necessity of second dose surfactant administration was 8.9% in the ES treatment group. Although necessity of mechanical ventilation, nCPAP duration, oxygen need duration, rates of PDA, NEC, BPD, ROP stage >3 and mortality did not show a significant difference between groups, the ES treatment group had lower rates of pneumothorax and IVH≥ grade III when compared to the LS treatment group.

Conclusions: ES treatment decreases IVH (≥ grade III) and pneumothorax rates but does not have any effect on BPD when compared to LS.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.