211
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Neonatal cord blood adiponectin and insulin levels in very low birth weight preterm and healthy full-term infants

, &
Pages 616-620 | Received 14 Apr 2013, Accepted 08 Jul 2013, Published online: 15 Aug 2013
 

Abstract

Background: There are few studies concerning adiponectin and insulin concentration in cord blood of very low birth weight (VLBW) preterm and full-term newborns, small and appropriate for gestational age (GA).

Aim: To compare adiponectin and insulin concentrations between preterm and full-term infants, and to determine their relation with birth weight (BW) and size for GA.

Methods: A cross-sectional study of VLBW preterm newborns with GA < 32 weeks and BW < 1500 g, and full-term newborns with GA > 37 weeks born at our hospital between January 2010 and May 2011, was conducted. Exclusion criteria: major congenital malformation, inborn errors of metabolism, chromosomal anomalies. Adiponectin was determined by enzimoimunoassay with ELISA kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and insulin was assayed by chemiluminescence method.

Results: A total of 127 newborns were studied, 55 VLBW preterm (28 SGA), and 72 full-term (7 SGA). Insulin cord blood concentrations in preterm and full-term newborns were similar. Adiponectin concentrations were significantly lower in preterm than in full-term infants: 1.57 ± 0.74 pg/ml versus 2.4 ± 0.22 pg/ml (p < 0.001), respectively. Regression analyses showed that, after controlling for several neonatal and maternal factors, preterm birth was the only significant predictor of adiponectin concentrations.

Conclusion: Being born prematurely is the main determinant factor for lower adiponectin concentration in umbilical cord blood of newborns.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Vania Naomi Hirakata (Statistical Consulting) for her help with statistical analyses; the patients and families for participating in the protocol; Dr Úrsula Matte and Larissa Lutz for laboratory assistance and Linda Booij for the English revision.

The authors’ responsibilities were as follows - ACT: study design, data collection and analysis, and manuscript writing; RSP: study design, counseling, supervision, manuscript writing; RCS: study design, supervision, manuscript writing, coordinator of the study; all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.