![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
Objective: To develop and evaluate local, sex specific, small for gestational age (SGA) specific, large for gestational age (LGA) specific and combined (biometry, sex and Doppler indices) formulas for ultrasound estimated fetal weight (EFW).
Method: Low-risk singleton pregnancies that delivered within 7 days from ultrasound examination were assessed. A formula-generating group (1407 pregnancies) and a validation group (469 pregnancies) were created. Fractional regression analysis was used to develop the formulas. Systematic error, random error, fraction within the 10% of actual birth weight and Bland–Altman analysis were used.
Results: The local formula and the Hadlock formula with local co-efficients performed better than the Hadlock formula. The SGA-specific formula, the LGA-specific formula and the combined formula had the lower systematic error (MSE: +0.0022291, −0.4226888, +0.8386222, respectively) and the narrower 95% LOA (−292.8 to +292.23, −485.6 to +461.5, −425.7 to +450.46, respectively). The SGA- and the LGA-specific formulas had higher fraction within the 10% of actual birth weight (81.5% and 84%, respectively).
Conclusions: Local formulas improve the EFW calculation. The combined formula can further optimize the accuracy and precision. Application of specific formulas for the small and the large fetus had the most pronounced effect in improving fetal weight estimation.