485
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Predictive value of angiogenic factors, clinical risk factors and uterine artery Doppler for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction in second and third trimester pregnancies in an Ecuadorian population

, , , &
Pages 537-543 | Received 22 Oct 2014, Accepted 22 Jan 2015, Published online: 24 Feb 2015
 

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the performance of angiogenic factors, maternal risks and uterine artery Doppler (UAD) in the prediction of pre-eclampsia (PE) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) in a high-risk Ecuadorian population.

Methods: Patients with singleton pregnancies (n = 346) were investigated at two clinical visits (18–25 weeks and 28–32 weeks). Mean uterine artery (UA), pulsatility index (PI) and maternal biomarkers (soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1, placental growth factor, sFlt-1/PLGF ratio) were obtained. The main endpoints were PE and FGR. UA PI and angiogenic factor levels were compared for the groups with PE (n = 34), FGR (n = 26), PE & FGR (n = 14) and controls (n = 272). Multivariable stepwise logistic regression was used to construct prediction models.

Results: Pregnancies with either FGR or PE & FGR exhibited in the second trimester a significantly higher mean UA PI and sFlt-1/PLGF ratio and lower PLGF values compared to controls. In the third trimester, all groups with adverse outcome demonstrated significantly lower PLGF levels and a higher sFlt-1/PLGF ratio compared to normal pregnancies. Differences were most pronounced for pregnancies that developed PE and FGR for both time intervals. The combination of UAD and sFlt-1/PLGF ratio improved the predictive capacity for PE and FGR compared to each parameter alone. The best performance was obtained by integrating anamnestic risk factors, resulting in an area under the receiver operating curve for PE of 0.85 and 0.89 and for FGR of 0.79 and 0.77 in the second and third trimester, respectively.

Conclusion: In a high-altitude Ecuadorian population, angiogenic factors and UA PI were useful tools in the prediction of PE and/or FGR. The highest performance was achieved by the combination of these factors, including obstetric and medical history.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Humberto Navas, Dr. Ricardo Carrillo, Dr. Iván Ruilova, Dr. Rolando Montesinos and Silvia Cóndor, from the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Isidro Ayora in Quito, Ecuador; Dr. Mauricio Corral, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Metropolitano, Quito, Ecuador; Dr. Luis Narvaez and Dr. Marcelo Cruz, Netlab, Quito, Ecuador; Carlos Fiallos and Dra. Malena Tapia, Roche, Quito, Ecuador and Dr. Wim van der Helm, Roche, Switzerland for providing support to Carolin Kienast during the realization of the study in Ecuador.

Declaration of interest

The test kits were given as a free grant by Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland. O.R. is employed by Roche, Ecuador. Dr. Rolf Fimmers and Dr. Ute Klarmann, Department of Medical Biometrics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Bonn, for providing support in the statistical analyses. None of the other authors has a conflict of interest.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.