1,137
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Predicting outcome in 259 fetuses with agenesis of ductus venosus – a multicenter experience and systematic review of the literature*

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 3606-3614 | Received 31 Dec 2015, Accepted 17 Jan 2016, Published online: 03 Mar 2016
 

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate prenatal predictors of postnatal survival in fetuses with agenesis of ductus venosus (ADV).

Methods: This retrospective study reviewed our experience and the literature between 1991 and 2015. Prenatal findings were evaluated and perinatal morbidity and mortality was documented.

Results: A total of 259 cases were included in the present analysis from our centers and 49 published studies (15 patients from our retrospective cohort review and 244 from literature review). The intrahepatic and extrahepatic shunts were present in 32.0% (73/226) and 67.7% (153/226), respectively. Cardiomegaly (n = 64/259, 24.7%), hydrops (n = 31/259, 12.0%) and amniotic fluid abnormalities (n = 22/259, 8.5%) were among the most frequent initial ultrasound findings. One hundred and forty-seven fetuses (56.8%) had ADV without structural anomalies while 112 (43.2%) had associated anomalies (cardiac anomalies (n = 66), extra-cardiac anomalies (n = 19) and both cardiac and extra-cardiac anomalies (n = 27)). The mean gestational age (GA) at ultrasound diagnosis was 22.9 ± 6.9 weeks while the mean GA at delivery was 34 ± 7.5 weeks. The overall neonatal survival was 57.1% (n = 148/259). The following factors were associated with survival: advanced maternal age, earlier GA at diagnosis, prematurity, increased nuchal translucency, pericardial effusion, associated cardiac defects (especially AVSD), chromosomal abnormalities, hydrops, hygroma and limb anomalies.

Conclusion: Fetal hydrops, the presence of associated congenital anomalies and premature delivery are associated with poor prognosis in fetuses with ADV.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Supplementary materials available online

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.