896
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

A comparison of CIC and BTE hearing aids for three-dimensional localization of speech

, , , , &
Pages 723-732 | Received 20 Sep 2009, Accepted 08 Apr 2010, Published online: 02 Jun 2010
 

Abstract

Abstract

Three-dimensional sound localization of speech in anechoic space was examined for eleven listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. The listeners were fitted bilaterally with CIC and BTE hearing aids having similar bandwidth capabilities. The goal was to determine whether differences in microphone placement for these two styles (CICs at the ear canal entrance; BTEs above the pinna) would influence the availability of pinna-related spectral cues and hence localization performance. While lateral and polar angle localization was unaffected by the hearing aid style, the rate of front-back reversals was lower with CICs. This pattern persisted after listeners accommodated to each set of aids for a six week period, although the overall rate of reversals declined. Performance on all measures in all conditions was considerably poorer than in a control group of listeners with normal hearing.

Sumario

Se evaluó la localización tridimensional de sonidos del habla en un espacio anecoide en once personas con pérdida auditiva sensorineural. A los once se les adaptaron CIC y BTE bilateralmente con capacidad de ancho de banda similar. El objetivo fue determinar si las diferencias en la colocación del micrófono con ambos tipos (CIC en el ingreso del conducto auditivo; BTE sobre el pabellón auricular) podría influenciar la disponibilidad de claves espectrales relacionadas con el pabellón y por ello, el rendimiento para la localización. Mientras que la localización del ángulo lateral y polar no fue afectada por el tipo de auxiliar, la tasa de inversiones frente-atrás fue menor con los CIC. Este patrón persistió después de que estas personas se acostumbraron a cada set de auxiliares por un período de seis semanas, a pesar de que declinó la tasa global de reversiones. El rendimiento en todas las mediciones y condiciones fue considerablemente más pobre que en el grupo control de personas con audición normal.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Simon McMillan and Starkey Australia for helping to recruit subjects. This work was presented in part at the Australian Academy of Audiology Congress held on the Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, August 2009 and at the International Symposium on Auditory and Acoustics Research held in Helsingor, Denmark, August 2009.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.