295
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ArticlesPoisons Centres

Epidemic of poisoning caused by scopolamine disguised as Rohypnol™ tablets

, , , &
Pages 889-893 | Received 12 Jun 2009, Accepted 11 Sep 2009, Published online: 12 Oct 2009
 

Abstract

Objective. An epidemic of scopolamine poisonings occurred in Oslo in 2008 among users of illicit drugs, caused by fake Rohypnol™ pills. The clinical features, diagnostic process, and handling of the epidemic are presented. Methods. Suspected cases of scopolamine poisoning were extracted by reviewing registration forms from an ongoing prospective clinical study of acute poisonings in Oslo. Medical records of extracted contacts were examined and cases included according to specified clinical criteria. Results. Forty-four cases of probable scopolamine poisoning were registered. Main clinical features were mydriasis, visual hallucinations, plucking behavior, agitation, and coma. No clinical diagnosis of anticholinergic syndrome was made prior to forensic analysis of the tablets, the most frequent diagnosis up to this point being unspecified drug-induced psychosis. Later in the epidemic, scopolamine poisoning became the dominating diagnosis. Ten patients were admitted to psychiatric hospitals, the rest recovered in medical units, or left health care against medical advice. Discussion. Scopolamine poisonings are rare, but the resulting anticholinergic syndrome is well described. The syndrome was not recognized until the forensic analysis result strikingly changed how the patients were diagnosed and handled. A unique aspect of this epidemic was the intoxicating agent being scopolamine-containing tablets looking like Rohypnol™, sold and used under the impression of being the latter. Conclusion. Recognizing the anticholinergic syndrome is important to provide proper treatment. Forensic analysis was the key to correct diagnosis in this outbreak, demonstrating its importance in verifying an epidemic of poisoning by fake drugs.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dag Jacobsen at Oslo University Hospital Ullevaal for valuable comments; Anne Kathrine Nore at the EMA for support and critical discussions; Tormod Bønes at the National Criminal Investigation Service for information on the tablet analyses; Asbjørg Christophersen at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health for the analysis of the serum samples; and Kåre Stølen at Grønland Police Station for informative discussions on the epidemic.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.