32
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Stereoselectivity of the TDxADx/FLx Amphetamine/Methamphetamine II Amphetamine/Methamphetamine Immunoassay-Response of Urine Specimens Following Nasal Inhaler Use

&
Pages 35-41 | Published online: 25 Sep 2008
 

Abstract

The TDxADx/FLx Amphetamine/Methamphetamine II fluorescence polarization immunoassay (Abbott Diagnostic) for the detection of amphetamine and methamphetamine in urine was evaluated for stereoselectivity and response to specimens collected following as recommended and double the recommended dose use of Vicks Nasal Inhaler.The assay is calibrated with d-amphetamine, at cut off concentration of 300 ng/mL for a positive response. Cross-reactivity studies demonstrated a positive result with 1000 ng/mL l-amphetamine, 300 ng/mL dmethamphetamine, and approximately 2000 ng/mL desoxyephedrine. A good correlation was observed between urines obtained following ingestion of damphetamine simultaneously analyzed by TDxADx/FLx Amphetamine/Methamphetamine II and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry: r2 = 0.954, N = 100. However, urine obtained following ingestion of racemic methamphetamine showed no correlation between TDxADx/FLx Amphetamine/Methamphetamine II and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry results: r2 = 0.420, N = 28. Urines collected following as recommended use for five consecutive days of Vicks Nasal Inhaler containing l-desoxyephedrine did not yield positive TDxADx/FLx Amphetamine/Methamphetamine II results. Only two urines from a subject using twice the recommended inhaler dose yielded positive TDxADx/FLx Amphetamine/Methamphetamine II results. These urines contained 1560 and 1530 ng/mL desoxyephedrine when analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Greater than recommended use of Vicks Nasal Inhaler may yield false positive TDxADx/FLx Amphetamine/Methamphetamine II results for amphetamine use when calibrated at 300 ng/mL d-amphetamine. If calibrated at 1000 ng/mL, d-amphetamine, the TDxADx/FLx Amphetamine/Methamphetamine II is unlikely to yeild false positive results for amphetamine, even following excessive inhaler use.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.