172
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Pharmacotoxicology of monocyte-macrophage nanoformulated antiretroviral drug uptake and carriage

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 592-605 | Received 02 Aug 2010, Accepted 15 Nov 2010, Published online: 22 Dec 2010
 

Abstract

Limitations inherent to antiretroviral therapy (ART) in its pharmacokinetic properties remain despite over 15 years of broad use. Our laboratory has pioneered a means to improve ART delivery through monocyte-macrophage carriage of nanoformulated drug-encapsulated particles (nanoART). To this end, our prior works sought to optimize nanoART size, charge, and physical properties for cell uptake and antiretroviral activities. To test the functional consequences of indinavir, ritonavir, and efavirenz formulations we investigated relationships between human monocyte and macrophage cytotoxicities and nanoART dose, size, surfactant, and preparation. Wet-milled particles were more cytotoxic to monocytes-macrophages than those prepared by homogenization; with concurrent induction of tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Interestingly, pure suspensions of indinavir and ritonavir at 0.5 mM, and efavirenz at 0.1 mM and 0.5 mM also proved cytotoxic. Individual surfactants and formulated fluconazole neither affected cell function or viability. Although nanoART did not alter brain tight junction proteins ZO-2 and occludin, 0. 5mM ritonavir formulations did alter brain transendothelial electric resistance. These results underscore the potential importance of evaluating the physicochemical and functional properties of nanoART before human evaluations.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Han Chen and Dr You Zhou of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln electron microscopy core facility for assistance with the SEM analysis.

Declaration of interest: This work was supported by NIH grants RO1MH081780 (to GDK), 1P01DA028555-01, P01 NS043985 and P20 RR15635 (to HEG and GDK), 2R37 NS36126, PO1 NS31492, 2R01 NS034239, and P01MH64570 (to HEG). The authors report no conflict of interest. The authors are responsible for the content of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.