898
Views
43
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Compared in vivo toxicity in mice of lung delivered biodegradable and non-biodegradable nanoparticles

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 292-302 | Received 19 Oct 2014, Accepted 18 May 2015, Published online: 17 Nov 2015
 

Abstract

To design nanoparticle (NP)-based drug delivery systems for pulmonary administration, biodegradable materials are considered safe, but their potential toxicity is poorly explored. We here explore the lung toxicity in mice of biodegradable nanoparticles (NPs) and compare it to the toxicity of non-biodegradable ones. NP formulations of poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) coated with chitosan (CS), poloxamer 188 (PF68) or poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), which renders 200 nm NPs of positive, negative or neutral surface charge respectively, were analyzed for their biodistribution by in vivo fluorescence imaging and their inflammatory potential after single lung nebulization in mice. After exposure, analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cell population, protein secretion and cytokine release as well as lung histology were carried out. The inflammatory response was compared to the one induced by non-biodegradable counterparts, namely, TiO2 of rutile and anatase crystal form and polystyrene (PS). PLGA NPs were mostly present in mice lungs, with little passage to other organs. An increase in neutrophil recruitment was observed in mice exposed to PS NPs 24 h after nebulization, which declined at 48 h. This result was supported by an increase in interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) in BAL supernatant at 24 h. TiO2 anatase NPs were still present in lung cells 48 h after nebulization and induced the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and the recruitment of polymorphonuclear cells to BAL. In contrast, regardless of their surface charge, PLGA NPs did not induce significant changes in the inflammation markers analyzed. In conclusion, these results point out to a safe use of PLGA NPs regardless of their surface coating compared to non-biodegradable ones.

Acknowledgements

The authors warmly thank Dr Dominique Berrebi, Françoise Gaudin-Nomé and Patrice Hémon (Histology platform, Inserm UMR 996, Clamart, France) for histological observations and help in interpretation and Sylvie Chollet-Martin (Inserm UMR 996) for helpful discussions. This work has used the facilities and the expertises of the Electron Microscopy Platform of the Imagif Cell Biology unit (Centre de Recherche de Gif – www.imagif.cnrs.fr) with the technical assistance of C. Boulogne.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. Institut Galien Paris-Sud is a member of the Laboratory of Excellence LERMIT supported by a grant from ANR (ANR-10-LABX-33). This study was supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (under reference 2009 CESA 011) and by the Fonds de Dotation Recherche en Santé Respiratoire (appel d'offre 2011).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.