1,461
Views
95
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients aged less than 65

Combined data from the Australian and Swedish Knee Registries

, , , , &
Pages 90-94 | Received 01 Oct 2009, Accepted 15 Nov 2009, Published online: 22 Feb 2010
 

Abstract

Introduction and purpose In recent years, there has been renewed interest in using unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Several studies have reported increasing numbers of UKAs for osteoarthritis in patients who are less than 65 years of age, with low revision rates. To describe and compare the use and outcome of UKA in this age group, we have combined data from the Australian and Swedish knee registries.

Patients and methods More than 34,000 UKA procedures carried out between 1998 and 2007 were analyzed, and we focused on over 16,000 patients younger than 65 years to determine usage and to determine differences in the revision rate. Survival analysis was used to determine outcomes of revision related to age and sex, using any reason for revision as the endpoint.

Results Both countries showed a decreasing use of UKA in recent years in terms of the proportion of knee replacements and absolute numbers undertaken per year. The 7-year cumulative risk of revision of UKA in patients younger than 65 years was similar in the two countries. Patients younger than 55 years had a statistically significantly higher cumulative risk of revision than patients aged 55 to 64 years (19% and 12%, respectively at 7 years). The risk of revision in patients less than 65 years of age was similar in both sexes.

Interpretation The results of the combined UKA data from the Australian and Swedish registries show a uniformity of outcome between countries with patients aged less than 65 having a higher rate of revision than patients who were 65 or older. Surgeons and patients should be aware of the higher risk of revision in this age group.

Acknowledgments

AWD: study design and data selection. OR: study design, data selection, and data analysis. LL: study design. LM: data analysis. DD: study design and data selection. SG: study design and data selection. All authors prepared the manuscript.

This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR), the Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, the Swedish Research Council - Medicine (09509), Stiftelsen för bistånd åt rörelsehindrade i Skåne, and the Australian Commonwealth Government.

No competing interests declared.