1,266
Views
74
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Infectiological, functional, and radiographic outcome after revision for prosthetic hip infection according to a strict algorithm

22 one-stage and 50 two-stage revisions with a mean follow-up time of 5 (2–17) years

, , , , &
Pages 27-34 | Received 01 Mar 2010, Accepted 17 Sep 2010, Published online: 29 Dec 2010
 

Abstract

Background and purpose Successful treatment of prosthetic hip joint infection (PI) means elimination of infection and restored hip function. However, functional outcome is rarely studied. We analyzed the outcome of the strict use of a treatment algorithm for PI.

Patients and methods The study groups included 22 hips with 1-stage exchange for PI (group 1), 22 matched hips revised for aseptic loosening (controls), and 50 hips with 2-stage exchange (group 2). Relapse of infection, Harris hip score (HHS), limping, use of crutches, reoperations, complications, and radiographic changes were compared between the groups.

Results There was 1 relapse of infection, which occurred in group 2. In group 1, the mean HHS was 84; 4 of 19 patients were limping and 2 required 2 crutches, which was similar to the control results. In group 2, scores were lower and complication rates higher. The use of a Burch-Schneider ring and the presence of a deficient trochanter impaired function. There were no differences in radiographic outcome between the groups.

Interpretation With the algorithm used, infection can be cured with high reliability. With a 1-stage procedure, mobility is maintained. After 2-stage procedures, function was impaired due to there being more previous surgery and more serious infection.

FHRDEM: study design, patient follow-up, preparation of data and manuscript writing. PS: infection treatment and manuscript writing. WZ: infection treatment and study design. ThBM: surgical treatment and patient follow-up. PEO: surgical treatment, patient follow-up and study design. ThI: patient follow-up, study design and manuscript writing.

We thank Peter Graber and Martin Lüem for their outstanding contributions to this study, Petra Heesterbeek and Patsy Anderson for statistical help, and Susanna Häfliger for secretarial assistance.