1,075
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Spine, shoulder and hand

Preoperative corticosteroid injections are associated with worse long-term outcome of surgical carpal tunnel release

A retrospective study of 174 hands with a mean follow-up of 5.5 years

, , &
Pages 102-106 | Received 17 Oct 2012, Accepted 17 Oct 2013, Published online: 29 Nov 2013
 

Abstract

Background and purpose Failed closed treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is often followed by surgery. We investigated whether preoperative steroid injections could have a negative effect on the long-term outcome of the operation.

Patients and methods 174 hands (164 patients) were operated on by a single surgeon at Tartu University Hospital in 2005. The patients were interviewed by telephone 5–6 years after the operation. Self-reported data were gathered retrospectively concerning the number of steroid injections received before the surgery and the perceived regression of symptoms (on a 100-point numeric rating scale) at the time of interview. The patients were also asked about the presence of specific symptoms of CTS if regression of their symptoms had not been complete.

Results 93 of the 174 hands had complete regression of symptoms. Each additional injection was associated with an increased risk of occurrence of pain (RR = 1.1, 95% CI: 1.02–1-2), paresthesiae (RR = 1.1, CI: 1.1–1.2), and nocturnal awakenings (RR = 1.2, CI: 1.1–1.3). There was a weak association between the number of injections and the score given to regression of symptoms.

Interpretation This is the first study to indicate that patients who received a greater number of local steroid injections preoperatively were more likely to have postoperative complaints associated with CTS.

The work presented here was carried out through collaboration by all the authors. PSV collected and interpreted the data, performed statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript. MK performed statistical analysis, interpreted the data, and revised the manuscript. LK made significant revisions to the manuscript and contributed to the literature overview. MB defined the hypothesis, designed the study, interpreted the data, and made major revisions to the manuscript.

No competing interests declared.