2,748
Views
47
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Hip and pelvis

A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of MARS MRI and ultrasound of the painful metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 375-382 | Received 25 Nov 2013, Accepted 08 Feb 2014, Published online: 03 Apr 2014
 

Abstract

Background and purpose

Metal artifact reduction sequence (MARS) MRI and ultrasound scanning (USS) can both be used to detect pseudotumors, abductor muscle atrophy, and tendinous pathology in patients with painful metal-on-metal (MOM) hip arthroplasty. We wanted to determine the diagnostic test characteristics of USS using MARS MRI as a reference for detection of pseudotumors and muscle atrophy.

Patients and methods

We performed a prospective cohort study to compare MARS MRI and USS findings in 19 consecutive patients with unilateral MOM hips. Protocolized USS was performed by consultant musculoskeletal radiologists who were blinded regarding clinical details. Reports were independently compared with MARS MRI, the imaging gold standard, to calculate predictive values.

Results

The prevalence of pseudotumors on MARS MRI was 68% (95% CI: 43–87) and on USS it was 53% (CI: 29–76). The sensitivity of USS in detecting pseudotumors was 69% (CI 39–91) and the specificity was 83% (CI: 36–97). The sensitivity of detection of abductor muscle atrophy was 47% (CI: 24–71). In addition, joint effusion was detected in 10 cases by USS and none were seen by MARS MRI.

Interpretation

We found a poor agreement between USS and MARS MRI. USS was inferior to MARS MRI for detection of pseudotumors and muscle atrophy, but it was superior for detection of joint effusion and tendinous pathologies. MARS MRI is more advantageous than USS for practical reasons, including preoperative planning and longitudinal comparison.

Guarantors of integrity of the entire study (AJH, KS, AKL), study concepts and design (IAS, SAS), literature research (IAS), clinical studies (KS, AKL, IAS), experimental studies and data analysis (IAS), statistical analysis (SC, IAS), manuscript preparation (IAS), and manuscript editing (all authors).

AJH has a contract with de Puy for clinical advice to patients with ASR hips. De Puy had no involvement in planning of the study, data collection, interpretation of data, or writing of the manuscript.