![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
Background and purpose Internal fixation of hip fractures is a common and important procedure that orthopedic surgeons must master early in their career. Virtual-reality training could improve initial skills, and a simulation-based test would make it possible to ensure basic competency of junior surgeons before they proceed to supervised practice on patients. The aim of this study was to develop a reliable and valid test with credible pass/fail standards.
Methods 20 physicians (10 untrained novices and 10 experienced orthopedic surgeons) each performed 3 internal fixation procedures of an undisplaced femoral neck fracture: 2 hook-pins, 2 screws, and a sliding hip screw. All procedures were preformed on a trauma simulator. Performance scores for each procedure were obtained from the predefined metrics of the simulator. The inter-case reliability of the simulator metrics was explored by calculation of intra-class correlation coefficient. Validity was explored by comparison between novices’ and experts’ scores using independent-samples t-test. A pass/fail standard was set by the contrasting-groups method and the consequences were explored.
Results The percentage of maximum combined score (PM score) showed an inter-case reliability of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.65–0.93) between the 3 procedures. The mean PM score was 30% (CI: 7–53) for the novices and 76% (CI: 68–83) for the experienced surgeons. The pass/fail standard was set at 58%, resulting in none of the novices passing the test and a single experienced surgeon failing the test.
Interpretation The simulation-based test was reliable and valid in our setting, and the pass/fail standard could discriminate between novices and experienced surgeons. Potentially, training and testing of future junior surgeons on a virtual-reality simulator could ensure basic competency before proceeding to supervised practice on patients.
Planning and design of the study: PP, HP, CR, and LK. Hypothesis: PP and LK. Statistical analysis: LK. Writing of the manuscript: PP. All the authors revised and approved the final manuscript.
There was no external funding for the study. The study was performed completely independently of the simulator company. None of the authors have any competing interests to declare.