1,585
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perthes' disease and fractures

Prevalence and clinical significance of occult fractures in children with radiograph-negative acute ankle injury

A meta-analysis

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 518-524 | Received 06 Feb 2014, Accepted 28 Feb 2014, Published online: 30 May 2014
 

Abstract

Background and purpose — Plain radiographs may fail to reveal an ankle fracture in children because of developmental and anatomical characteristics. In this systematic review and meta- analysis, we estimated the prevalence of occult fractures in children with acute ankle injuries and clinical suspicion of fracture, and assessed the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound (US) in the detection of occult fractures.

Methods — We searched the literature and included studies reporting the prevalence of occult fractures in children with acute ankle injuries and clinical suspicion of fracture. Proportion meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled prevalence of occult fractures. For each individual study exploring the US diagnostic accuracy, we calculated US operating characteristics.

Results — 9 studies (involving 187 patients) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (n = 5) or late radiographs (n = 4) as reference standard were included, 2 of which also assessed the diagnostic accuracy of US. Out of the 187 children, 41 were found to have an occult fracture. The pooled prevalence of occult fractures was 24% (95% CI: 18–31). The operating characteristics for detection of occult ankle fractures by US ranged in positive likelihood ratio (LR) from 9 to 20, and in negative LR from 0.04 to 0.08.

Interpretation — A substantial proportion of fractures may be overlooked on plain radiographs in children with acute ankle injuries and clinical suspicion of fracture. US appears to be a promising method for detection of ankle fractures in such children when plain radiographs are negative.

AN, EN, FD, XD, and AM designed the study protocol. AN, EN, and AM designed the search strategy for the literature search. AN and EN selected the articles, gathered the data, and performed the study quality assessment. AN, EN, FD, and AM performed statistical analysis. All the authors contributed to writing and presentation of the manuscript and approved the final version.

No competing interests declared.

Notes