1,258
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Hip and pelvis

Good stability but high periprosthetic bone mineral loss and late-occurring periprosthetic fractures with use of uncemented tapered femoral stems in patients with a femoral neck fracture

A 5-year follow-up of 31 patients using RSA and DXA

, , , , , & show all
Pages 396-402 | Received 13 Aug 2013, Accepted 07 Feb 2014, Published online: 23 Jun 2014
 

Abstract

Background and purpose— We previously evaluated a new uncemented femoral stem designed for elderly patients with a femoral neck fracture and found stable implant fixation and good clinical results up to 2 years postoperatively, despite substantial periprosthetic bone mineral loss. We now present the medium-term follow-up results from this study.

Patients and methods— In this observational prospective cohort study, we included 50 patients (mean age 81 (70–92) years) with a femoral neck fracture. All patients underwent surgery with a cemented cup and an uncemented stem specifically designed for fracture treatment. Outcome variables were migration of the stem measured with radiostereometry (RSA) and periprosthetic change in bone mineral density (BMD), measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Hip function and health-related quality of life were assessed using the Harris hip score (HHS) and the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). DXA and RSA data were collected at regular intervals up to 4 years, and data concerning reoperations and hip-related complications were collected during a mean follow-up time of 5 (0.2–7.5) years.

Results— At 5 years, 19 patients had either passed away or were unavailable for further participation and 31 could be followed up. Of the original 50 patients, 6 patients had suffered a periprosthetic fracture, all of them sustained after the 2-year follow-up. In 19 patients, we obtained complete RSA and DXA data and no component had migrated after the 2-year follow-up. We also found a continuous total periprosthetic bone loss amounting to a median of –19% (–39 to 2). No changes in HHS or EQ-5D were observed during the follow-up period.

Interpretation— In this medium-term follow-up, the stem remained firmly fixed in bone despite considerable periprosthetic bone mineral loss. However, this bone loss might explain the high number of late-occurring periprosthetic fractures. Based on these results, we would not recommend uncemented femoral stems for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly.

OS initiated the study, followed up patients, and wrote the manuscript. HS, PKP, and OM followed up patients and wrote the manuscript. TE and AS wrote the manuscript.

We express our sincere thanks and gratitude to all the staff of the Department of Nuclear Medicine and the Department of Radiology, Danderyd Hospital, who assisted us with this study, particularly Hans-Jerker Lundberg for his technical assistance with the DEXA analyses and Lise-Lotte Widmark for her invaluable help and assistance in conducting the RSA examinations. We also thank Dr Max Gordon for his help with the statistical analysis.

No competing interests declared.

Notes