2,078
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Children

Outcome in adolescence of brachial plexus birth palsy

69 individuals re-examined after 10–20 years

, , &
Pages 633-640 | Received 25 Mar 2014, Accepted 07 Jul 2014, Published online: 19 Sep 2014
 

Abstract

Background and purpose — The frequency and severity of a permanent lesion after brachial plexus birth palsy (BPBP) and its impact on activities of daily living are not well documented. We therefore investigated the outcome of BPBP in adolescents, regarding arm function and consequences for activity and participation.

Participants and methods — Of 30,574 babies born at St. Olavs University Hospital in 1991–2000, 91 had BPBP (prevalence 3 per 1,000), and 69 of these individuals were examined at a median age of 14 (10–20) years. The examination included the modified Mallet classification, range of motion, shoulder rotation and grip strength, Assisting Hand Assessment, and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Of the 22 subjects who were not examined, 3 could not be traced and 19 reported having no problems in the affected arm.

Results — At follow-up, 17 adolescents had a permanent lesion (i.e. individual Mallet subscore below 4) with a median Mallet total score of 15 (9–19), while 52 had good or normal shoulder function (median Mallet total score 25 (23–25)). All participants with a permanent lesion had reduced active shoulder rotation (≤ 15°), 16 had elbow extension deficit, and 10 had subnormal grip strength. External rotation was considerably weaker in the affected shoulder. In addition, they had ineffective use of the affected arm in bimanual activities. Even so, all except 1 were independent in activities of daily living, although 15 experienced minor difficulties.

Interpretation — Every fourth to fifth child with BPBP had a permanent lesion as an adolescent. External rotation was the most impaired movement. Despite ineffective use of the affected arm in bimanual activities, all of the participants except one were independent in activities of daily living.

GH, MB, and AKE initiated and designed the study and collected data. AKE and TV did the statistical analysis. GH wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. All the authors contributed to interpretation of the data and revision of the final manuscript.

This study was funded in part by HiST; the Faculty of Health Education and Social Work, Sør-Trøndelag University College; the Liaison Committee between the Central Norway Regional Health Authority (RHA) and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU); St. Olavs University Hospital; and Unimed Innovation AS.

No competing interests declared.