1,991
Views
39
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Hip and knee arthroplasty

Similar outcome after retention or sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty

A systematic review and meta-analysis

, , , , &
Pages 195-201 | Received 22 May 2014, Accepted 12 Sep 2014, Published online: 17 Oct 2014
 

Abstract

Background and purpose — To retain or to sacrifice the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a matter of discussion. In this systematic review, we wanted to find differences in functional and clinical outcome between the 2 methods.

Methods — We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis including all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that have compared PCL retention with PCL sacrifice in TKA with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Primary outcome was range of motion. Secondary outcomes were knee pain and clinical scoring systems that were preferably validated. Quality of evidence was graded using the GRADE approach. All outcomes available for data pooling were used for meta-analysis.

Results — 20 studies involving 1,877 patients and 2,347 knees were included. In meta-analysis, the postoperative flexion angle had a mean difference of 2 degrees (95% CI: 0.23–4.0; p = 0.03) and the KSS functional score was 2.4 points higher in favor of PCL sacrifice (95% CI: 0.41–4.3; p = 0.02). There were no statistically significant differences regarding other measured clinical outcomes such as WOMAC, KSS pain, clinical and overall score, HSS score, SF-12, radiolucencies, femoro-tibial angle, and tibial slope. The quality of the studies varied considerably. Risk of bias in most studies was unclear; 5 were judged to have a low risk of bias and 5 to have a high risk of bias.

Interpretation — We found no clinically relevant differences between retention and sacrifice of the PCL in TKA, in terms of functional and clinical outcomes. The quality of the studies ranged from moderate to low. Based on the current evidence, no recommendation can be made as to whether to retain or to sacrifice the PCL.

WCV: literature search, selection of articles, and writing of the manuscript. LGHvdB and WCHJ: selection of articles and revision of the manuscript. JWS: literature search. ABW and RGHHN: revision of the manuscript.

No competing interests declared.

Research was funded by Sanquin Blood Bank, the Netherlands and the Dutch Rheumatology Association (LRR grant).