2,098
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Perioperative local infiltration anesthesia with ropivacaine has no effect on postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 116 patients

, , , , &
Pages 654-658 | Received 05 Mar 2015, Accepted 24 Mar 2015, Published online: 22 May 2015
 

Abstract

Background and purpose — The local infiltration analgesia (LIA) technique has been widely used to reduce opioid requirements and to improve postoperative mobilization following total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the evidence for the efficacy of LIA in THA is not yet clear. We determined whether single-shot LIA in addition to a multimodal analgesic regimen would reduce acute postoperative pain and opioid requirements after THA.

Patients and methods — 116 patients undergoing primary THA under spinal anesthesia were included in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. All patients received oral opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia: etoricoxib, acetaminophen, and glucocorticoid. The patients were randomized to receive either 150 mL ropivacaine (2 mg/mL) and 0.5 mL epinephrine (1 mg/mL) or 150 mL 0.9% saline. Rescue analgesic consisted of morphine and oxycodone as needed. The primary endpoint was pain during mobilization in the recovery unit. Secondary endpoints were pain during mobilization on the day after surgery and total postoperative opioid requirements on the first postoperative day.

Results — The levels of pain during mobilization—both in the recovery unit and on the day after surgery—and consumption of opioids on the first postoperative day were similar in the 2 groups.

Interpretation — LIA did not provide any extra analgesic effect after THA over and above that from the multimodal analgesic regimen used in this study.

All the authors contributed substantially to planning of the study and drafting of the article. JKH and TSW wrote the article and conducted the study. TSW, OAF, JKH, and SBW conducted the data analyses and interpreted the results.

We thank the nursing staff who participated in collection of the registry data used in this study. Special thanks to the operating nurses in the orthopedic operating ward unit responsible for organizing and conducting the study intervention.

No competing interests declared.