1,298
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Experimental models for cancellous bone healing in the rat

Comparison of drill holes and implanted screws

, &
Pages 745-750 | Received 13 Mar 2015, Accepted 19 Jun 2015, Published online: 22 Jul 2015
 

Abstract

Background and purpose — Cancellous bone appears to heal by mechanisms different from shaft fracture healing. There is a paucity of animal models for fractures in cancellous bone, especially with mechanical evaluation. One proposed model consists of a screw in the proximal tibia of rodents, evaluated by pull-out testing. We evaluated this model in rats by comparing it to the healing of empty drill holes, in order to explain its relevance for fracture healing in cancellous bone. To determine the sensitivity to external influences, we also compared the response to drugs that influence bone healing.

Methods — Mechanical fixation of the screws was measured by pull-out test and related to the density of the new bone formed around similar, but radiolucent, PMMA screws. The pull-out force was also related to the bone density in drill holes at various time points, as measured by microCT.

Results — The initial bone formation was similar in drill holes and around the screw, and appeared to be reflected by the pull-out force. Both models responded similarly to alendronate or teriparatide (PTH). Later, the models became different as the bone that initially filled the drill hole was resorbed to restore the bone marrow cavity, whereas on the implant surface a thin layer of bone remained, making it change gradually from a trauma-related model to an implant fixation model.

Interpretation — The similar initial bone formation in the different models suggests that pull-out testing in the screw model is relevant for assessment of metaphyseal bone healing. The subsequent remodeling would not be of clinical relevance in either model.

PA, MB, and OS planned the study. MB and OS conducted the experiments. PA, MB, and OS did the data analysis. MB wrote the first draft of the manuscript.

This study was supported by the Swedish Research Council (2031-47-5), AFA insurance company, the EU Seventh Framework program (FP7/2007-2013, grant 279239), and a specific grant from Linköping University.

PA has shares in Addbio AB, and has received institutional research support from Eli Lilly and Company. The other authors have no competing interests.