4,826
Views
65
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

A review of factors influencing participation in social and community activities for wheelchair users

, &
Pages 361-374 | Received 31 Jul 2014, Accepted 15 Nov 2014, Published online: 04 Dec 2014
 

Abstract

Objective: To systematically identify factors associated with participation in social and community activities for adult wheelchair users (WCUs). Data sources: PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and EMBASE. Study selection: Quantitative and qualitative peer-reviewed publications were included, which were written in English, reported original research and investigated factors associated with social and community participation in adult WCUs. Data extraction: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used. Factors were organized using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Data synthesis: Thirty-five studies were selected: two of power WCUs, 10 of manual WCUs and 23 of both. Six qualitative studies, ranging in quality from 8/10 to 9/10 and 29 quantitative studies were included, ranging in quality from 4/15 to 11/15. Fifteen body function, 4 activity, 5 participation, 15 environmental and 14 personal factors were found to be associated with social and community participation. Conclusions: Social and community participation of WCUs is associated with factors from all ICF domains. Wheelchair factors, accessibility, skills with wheelchair use, pain, finances and education are modifiable factors frequently reported to be associated with participation. Experimental research focusing on modifiable factors is needed to further our understanding of factors influencing participation among WCUs.

    Implications for Rehabilitation

  • Wheelchair factors, including comfort and durability, are associated with participation and may be targeted in clinical intervention.

  • Wheelchair skills are clinically modifiable and have been shown to improve participation in manual wheelchair users.

  • Body functions (e.g. confidence, depression and fatigue) and personal factors (e.g. finances and level of education) may be considered for clinical intervention.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the support of the GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no declaration of interest.

This research was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (Doctoral Scholarship to BMS), Operating Grant (IAP-107848), the CIHR CanWheel Emerging team in Wheeled Mobility for Older Adults (AMG-100925) and by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council Partnership Grant (895-2013-1021).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.