Evidence-based practice in speech-language pathology curricula: A scoping study

Abstract

This scoping study investigated how evidence-based practice (EBP) principles are taught in Australian speech-language pathology (SLP) teaching and learning contexts. It explored how Australian SLP university programs: (1) facilitate student learning about the principles of EBP in academic and clinical settings, and (2) self-evaluate their curricula in relation to EBP. The research involved two surveys. Survey 1 respondents were 131 academic staff, program coordinators, and on-campus and off-campus clinical educators. This survey gathered information about EBP teaching and learning in SLP programs as well as future EBP curriculum plans. Survey 2 investigated how clinical educators incorporated EBP into the way they taught clinical decision-making to students. Surveys responses from 85 clinical educators were analysed using descriptive and non-parametric statistics and thematic grouping of open-ended qualitative responses. Both surveys revealed strengths and gaps in integrating EBP into Australian SLP curricula. Perceived strengths were that respondents were positive about EBP, most had EBP training and access to EBP resources. The perceived gaps included the academic staff's perceptions of students' understanding and application of EBP, respondents' understanding of research methodologies, communication and collaboration between academic staff and clinical educators, and a lack of explicit discussion by clinical educators and students of EBP in relation to clients.

Keywords:

• Evidence-based practice (EBP)
• speech-language pathology
• curriculum development
• scoping study

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Australian Learning and Teaching Council (formerly the Carrick Institute) which funded the Discipline Based Initiative Grant supporting this research. The adult swallowing case study reported in this paper was formulated in collaboration with the NSW Speech Pathology EBP Network Tracheostomy Group and in particular we thank Rachelle Robinson for her input.