527
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Hormonal Crosstalk with Calcium Channel Blocker during Implantation

, &
Pages 186-189 | Received 24 May 2010, Accepted 02 Sep 2010, Published online: 30 Dec 2010
 

Abstract

The site specific action of the calcium channel blocker diltiazem in blocking prostaglandin synthesis and hence causing blastocyst implantation failure has been previously described. Based on this understanding it was important to learn if this pathway was under the control of the fine balance in estradiol-progesterone (E2-P4) milieu, considered to be of the utmost significance for effective implantation. In the current study the circulating E2-P4 levels were monitored on the first 6 d of pregnancy at various time points using sensitive chemiluminescence based assays. Next, diltiazem was administered intra-luminally into the uterus at 10-20 h prior to implantation as this time has been previously implicated to be when the best anti-implantation activity of diltiazem can be observed. Following this, the E2-P4 in peripheral circulation was again monitored. On d 6 (post implantation) the implantation sites were observed in the uterus of both diltiazem treated and untreated groups using Chicago blue dye and correlated to the hormonal activity. The levels of both estradiol and progesterone were very similar in both untreated and diltiazem treated groups during and post implantation. However complete implantation failure was noted in the diltiazem treated group whereas prominent implantation sites were observed in the untreated animals. Thus, the previously reported inhibition of blastocyst implantation cascade by calcium channel blockers during the ‘implantation window’ seems to be an independent mechanism interfering with uterine receptivity without any direct estrogen-progesterone control and further studies to understand its regulation need to be performed.

Declaration of Interest: The authors express their gratitude towards the Industries Commissionerate, Government of Gujarat, India for their financial support towards this project. No conflicts of interest exist. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.