1,448
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Prostate-specific antigen doubling time subsequent to radical prostatectomy is a predictor of outcome following salvage external beam radiation therapy: A single-centre experience

, , , , &
Pages 218-223 | Received 28 Apr 2014, Accepted 23 Oct 2014, Published online: 27 Nov 2014
 

Abstract

Objective. The aim of this study was to review the impact of salvage external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) of postprostatectomy patients with long-term follow-up on biochemical-free recurrence (BFR) and metastatic-free survival, and to describe pathological and clinical predictors of outcome. Materials and methods. In the period 1987–2010, 76 postprostatectomy patients with biochemical and clinical recurrence received salvage EBRT. Patients were treated with conformal EBRT and 68 (90%) received a dose of 70 Gy; eight patients (10%) received a dose of 60–64 Gy. No patients received adjuvant or neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy in conjunction with salvage EBRT. Results. The median follow-up time after salvage EBRT was 82 months (range 5–192 months). Seventeen patients (22%) developed biochemical recurrence subsequent to postprostatectomy salvage EBRT during the observation time, and the overall 50 and 75 month actuarial BFR rates after salvage EBRT were 84% and 79%, respectively. Seven patients (9%) developed metastatic disease and two patients died of prostate cancer. Independent predictors of biochemical recurrence were seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) in the prostatectomy specimen (p < 0.05) and prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) of 6 months or less (p = 0.041) before salvage EBRT. Conclusions. Salvage EBRT provides effective long-term BFR and metastatic-free survival in a selected group of patients with detectable, rising prostate-specific antigen values following radical prostatectomy. SVI and PSADT are prognostic variables for a non-durable response to salvage EBRT and thus predictors of high-risk prostate cancer in patients in whom neoadjuvant and adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy should be considered.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.