28
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Scientific basis for the efficacy of combined use of antirheumatic drugs against bone destruction in rheumatoid arthritis

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 17-23 | Received 13 Oct 2006, Accepted 18 Oct 2006, Published online: 02 Jan 2014
 

Abstract

Finding a means to ameliorate and prevent bone destruction is one of the urgent issues in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Recent studies revealed bone-resorbing osteoclasts to be essential for arthritic bone destruction, but to date there has been scarce experimental evidence for the underlying mechanism of the bone-protective effect of antirheumatic drugs. Here we examined the effects of one or a combination of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on osteoclast differentiation to provide a cellular and molecular basis for their efficacy against bone destruction. The effects on osteoclast precursor cells and osteoclastogenesis-supporting cells were distinguished by two in vitro osteoclast culture systems. Methotrexate (MTX), bucillamine (Buc) and salazosulphapyridine (SASP) inhibited osteoclastogenesis by acting on osteoclast precursor cells and interfering with receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL)-mediated induction of the nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) c1. MTX and SASP also suppressed RANKL expression on osteoclastogenesis-supporting mesenchymal cells. Interestingly, the combination of three antirheumatic drugs exerted a marked inhibitory effect on osteoclastogenesis even at a low dose at which there was much less of an effect when administered individually. These results are consistent with the reported efficacy of combined DMARDs therapy in humans and suggest that osteoclast culture systems are useful tools to provide an experimental basis for the bone-protective effects of antirheumatic drugs.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.