261
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Cost and clinical consequences of stress/single-photon emission computed tomography testing with specific medications

, , , &
Pages 433-439 | Accepted 25 Apr 2011, Published online: 01 Jun 2011
 

Abstract

Background:

We identified the cost of care and clinical events using dipyridamole versus adenosine in pharmacological stress (ST)/single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion testing.

Methods:

Commercial health plan members received adenosine or dipyridamole as an adjunct to ST/SPECT testing during the period January 1, 2006, through November 30, 2008. Propensity score matching techniques were used to compare risk-adjusted, test-related complications, symptoms and costs.

Results:

A total of 12,351 patients underwent ST/SPECT testing with dipyridamole and 59,969 with adenosine. Risk-adjusted outcomes analysis showed that patients receiving dipyridamole had a higher number of emergency room (ER) visits (0.65 vs. 0.23%, p <0.001) and angina pectoris episodes (7.11 vs. 6.01%, p <0.001). The likelihood of shortness of breath was significantly higher (6.63 vs. 5.77%, p <0.001) in the adenosine group. One-day risk-adjusted, office-visit, outpatient hospital and other utilization costs for same day ST/SPECT testing were higher for the adenosine group. Risk-adjusted ER visit costs were higher for the dipyridamole group ($1276 vs. $1095, p <0.001).

Limitations:

First the presence of a claim for a filled prescription does not indicate that the medication was consumed or taken as prescribed. Second, medications filled over-the-counter or provided as samples will not be observed in the claims data. Third, presence of diagnosis codes on medical claims are not positive presence of disease, as diagnosis codes may be incorrectly coded or included as rule-out criteria rather than actual disease. Finally, certain information is not readily available in claims data that could have an effect on study outcomes, such as certain clinical and disease-specific parameters.

Conclusions:

Differences in complications and symptoms may help identify a better-tolerated vasodilator drug (VD) for use in pharmacologic stress testing based on a patient's history and symptoms. Implementation of a data-based strategy for the selection of the most appropriate stress-testing adjunctive agent may be a cost-effective step for institutions and health plans.

Transparency

Declaration of funding

The study was supported by Astellas Pharma US, Deerfield, IL, USA.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

O.B. was sponsored by i3 Global and M.L.M. is Medical Director of Medical Affairs at i3 Global. H.Y. has no relationship to be declared. J.S. was an employee of Astellas Pharma US by the time the article was written. S.K. is an employee of Astellas Pharma US.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the thoughtful review of this manuscript by R.G. McAllister, MD, Executive Director of Medical Affairs at i3 Global.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.