1,596
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Essential medicine policy in China: pros and cons

Pages 289-294 | Accepted 16 Nov 2012, Published online: 07 Dec 2012
 

Abstract

Objective:

To analyze the achievements, issues and policy recommendations for implementing essential medicine system in China after a 3-year effort.

Methods:

Policy documents analysis and Literature reviews are conducted.

Results:

From 2009–2011, a series of national essential medicine (EM) policies has been established which contain EM list, organizing production, quality assurance, pricing, tendering and procurement, distribution, rational use, monitoring and evaluation, etc. About 98.8% government-run primary healthcare institutions and 41.5% village health posts are conducting zero-mark-up policy while buying EMs. The average cost per visit, per admission, and per description in outpatient and inpatient departments has declined. The Issues with the national EM list cannot meet the requirements of clinical practice at the local level, all provinces have to increase additional 64–455 EMs in their local supplementary list; the limitation of EML in primary healthcare institutions causes patients to transfer directly to secondary or tertiary hospitals to search appropriate treatment; there is no defined regulation or legislation regarding the responsibility and accountability of government to compensate for the financial loss after implementing a zero mark-up policy in primary healthcare institutions. In the future, some innovative reform should be taken into account, such as revising EML, quality assurance, control margins within the distribution system, differential pricing and internal reference-based pricing, waive taxes and import duties of EMs, and separation between prescribing and dispensing in public hospital reform.

Conclusions:

Establishing a national essential medicine system is a difficult task to accomplish. The role of the zero-mark-up policy of EMs is to cut off the economic profit chain among different stakeholders. Using pharmaceutical profit to subsidize hospital revenue will be gradually eliminated in China.

Transparency

Declaration of funding

The author has received no funding in preparation of this manuscript.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

English language editing was provided by JME Editor-in-Chief, Professor Kenneth Lee, of Monash University and Mr Phil Garner, employed by Informa Business Information, the same parent company as Informa Healthcare.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.