![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
Citations (20)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (2)
Claudia Hellmers & Beate Schuecking. (2008) Primiparae's well‐being before and after birth and relationship with preferred and actual mode of birth in Germany and the USA. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 26:4, pages 351-372.
Read now
Read now
C. Allcock, A. Griffiths & R. Penketh. (2008) The effects of the attending obstetrician's anxiety trait and the corresponding obstetric intervention rates. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 28:4, pages 390-393.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (18)
Farhana Karim, Nazia Binte Ali, Abdullah Nurus Salam Khan, Aniqa Hassan, Mohammad Mehedi Hasan, Dewan Md. Emdadul Hoque, Sk. Masum Billah, Shams El Arifeen & Mohiuddin Ahsanul Kabir Chowdhury. (2020) Prevalence and factors associated with caesarean section in four Hard-to-Reach areas of Bangladesh: Findings from a cross-sectional survey. PLOS ONE 15:6, pages e0234249.
Crossref
Crossref
Maria Regina Torloni, Vanessa Brizuela & Ana Pilar Betran. (2020) Mass media campaigns to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections: a systematic review. BMJ Global Health 5:2, pages e001935.
Crossref
Crossref
Jostein Grytten, Irene Skau & Rune Sørensen. (2017) The impact of the mass media on obstetricians’ behavior in Norway. Health Policy 121:9, pages 986-993.
Crossref
Crossref
Ben J Steel & Julie Jomeen. (2015) Caesarean section by maternal request. British Journal of Midwifery 23:9, pages 624-629.
Crossref
Crossref
Claudia Malacrida. (2015) Always, already-medicalized: Women?s prenatal knowledge and choice in two Canadian contexts. Current Sociology 63:5, pages 636-651.
Crossref
Crossref
Claudia Malacrida & Tiffany Boulton. (2013) The best laid plans? Women’s choices, expectations and experiences in childbirth. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 18:1, pages 41-59.
Crossref
Crossref
Mary Regan & Katie McElroy. (2013) Women’s Perceptions of Childbirth Risk and Place of Birth. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 24:3, pages 239-252.
Crossref
Crossref
Tatiane Watanabe, Roxana Knobel, Guilherme Suchard, Mario Julio Franco, Eleonora d’Orsi, Elenice Bertanha Consonni & Marcos Consonni. (2012) Medical students’ personal choice for mode of delivery in Santa Catarina, Brazil: a cross-sectional, quantitative study. BMC Medical Education 12:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Eileen K. Hutton & Jude Kornelsen. (2012) Patient‐Initiated Elective Cesarean Section of Nulliparous Women in British Columbia, Canada. Birth 39:3, pages 175-182.
Crossref
Crossref
Jostein Grytten, Irene Skau & Rune Sørensen. (2011) Do expert patients get better treatment than others? Agency discrimination and statistical discrimination in obstetrics. Journal of Health Economics 30:1, pages 163-180.
Crossref
Crossref
Jude Kornelsen, Eileen Hutton & Sarah Munro. (2010) Influences on Decision Making Among Primiparous Women Choosing Elective Caesarean Section in the Absence of Medical Indications: Findings From a Qualitative Investigation. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 32:10, pages 962-969.
Crossref
Crossref
Jennifer Fenwick, Lynne Staff, Jenny Gamble, Debra K. Creedy & Sara Bayes. (2010) Why do women request caesarean section in a normal, healthy first pregnancy?. Midwifery 26:4, pages 394-400.
Crossref
Crossref
Jill Milne, Amiram Gafni, Diane Lu, Stephen Wood, Reg Sauve & Sue Ross. (2009) Developing and pre-testing a decision board to facilitate informed choice about delivery approach in uncomplicated pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 9:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Susanne Darra. (2009) ‘Normal’, ‘natural’, ‘good’ or ‘good-enough’ birth: examining the concepts. Nursing Inquiry 16:4, pages 297-305.
Crossref
Crossref
Ingegerd Hildingsson. (2008) How much influence do women in Sweden have on caesarean section? A follow-up study of women's preferences in early pregnancy. Midwifery 24:1, pages 46-54.
Crossref
Crossref
Jenny Gamble, Debra K. Creedy, Chris McCourt, Jane Weaver & Sarah Beake. (2007) A Critique of the Literature on Women?s Request for Cesarean Section. Birth 34:4, pages 331-340.
Crossref
Crossref
Chris McCourt, Jane Weaver, Helen Statham, Sarah Beake, Jenny Gamble & Debra K. Creedy. (2007) Elective Cesarean Section and Decision Making: A Critical Review of the Literature. Birth 34:1, pages 65-79.
Crossref
Crossref
Carol Kingdon, Lisa Baker & Tina Lavender. (2006) Systematic Review of Nulliparous Women's Views of Planned Cesarean Birth: The Missing Component in the Debate about a Term Cephalic Trial. Birth 33:3, pages 229-237.
Crossref
Crossref