162
Views
38
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The influence of maternal request on the elective caesarean section rate

Pages 115-119 | Published online: 02 Jul 2009

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (2)

K. Gungorduk, O. Asicioglu, O. Celikkol, S. Sudolmus & C. Ark. (2010) Iatrogenic bladder injuries during caesarean delivery: A case control study. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 30:7, pages 667-670.
Read now
Anne Kirkeby Hansen, Kirsten Wisborg, Niels Uldbjerg & Tine Brink Henriksen. (2007) Elective caesarean section and respiratory morbidity in the term and near-term neonate. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 86:4, pages 389-394.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (36)

Diana Ramasauskaite, Anwar Nassar, Akaninyene Eseme Ubom & Wanda Nicholson. (2023) FIGO good practice recommendations for cesarean delivery on maternal request: Challenges for medical staff and families . International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 163:S2, pages 10-20.
Crossref
T Begum, KM Saif‐Ur‐Rahman, F Yaqoot, J Stekelenburg, S Anuradha, T Biswas, SA Doi & AA Mamun. (2020) Global incidence of caesarean deliveries on maternal request: a systematic review and meta‐regression. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 128:5, pages 798-806.
Crossref
Li-Li Jiang, Yin-Yan Gao, Wen-Bo He, Ting Gan, Hou-Qian Shan & Xue-Mei Han. (2020) Cesarean section and risk of childhood leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Pediatrics 16:5, pages 471-479.
Crossref
Maria Regina Torloni, Vanessa Brizuela & Ana Pilar Betran. (2020) Mass media campaigns to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections: a systematic review. BMJ Global Health 5:2, pages e001935.
Crossref
Subhadeep Roy & L Montgomery Irvine. (2018) Caesarean section rate and postnatal bed occupancy: a retrospective study replacing assumptions with evidence. BMC Health Services Research 18:1.
Crossref
Marilia Reiter, Ana P. Betrán, Fernando K. Marques & Maria R. Torloni. (2018) Systematic review and meta‐analysis of studies on delivery preferences in Brazil. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 143:1, pages 24-31.
Crossref
Priyankur Roy, Lakshmanan Jeyaseelan & Jose Ruby. (2017) Respiratory Morbidity in Term Infants delivered by Elective Cesarean Section at a Tertiary Care Hospital in India: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 9:4, pages 312-317.
Crossref
Alexandra Bouchard & Aline Cohen de Lara. (2016) La césarienne sur demande maternelle : quels enjeux pour la femme ?. Corps & Psychisme N° 69:1, pages 59-71.
Crossref
Fatemeh Ghotbi, Azadeh Akbari Sene, Eznollah Azargashb, Farideh Shiva, Mina Mohtadi, Shahrzad Zadehmodares, Farah Farzaneh & Fakhr‐al‐molouk Yasai. (2014) Women's knowledge and attitude towards mode of delivery and frequency of cesarean section on mother's request in six public and private hospitals in T ehran, I ran, 2012 . Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 40:5, pages 1257-1266.
Crossref
Maria Regina Torloni, Ana Pilar Betrán, Pilar Montilla, Elisa Scolaro, Armando Seuc, Agustina Mazzoni, Fernando Althabe, Francesca Merzagora, Gian Paolo Donzelli & Mario Merialdi. (2013) Do Italian women prefer cesarean section? Results from a survey on mode of delivery preferences. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 13:1.
Crossref
Vincenzo Zanardo, Alessandra Canella, Rita Maone & Gianluca Straface. (2013) Bonding and breastfeeding after a cesarean delivery. Early Human Development 89, pages S56-S57.
Crossref
Emily Prior, Shalini Santhakumaran, Chris Gale, Lara H Philipps, Neena Modi & Matthew J Hyde. (2012) Breastfeeding after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of world literature. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 95:5, pages 1113-1135.
Crossref
Dorthe Fuglenes, Eline Aas, Grete Botten, Pål Øian & Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen. (2011) Why do some pregnant women prefer cesarean? The influence of parity, delivery experiences, and fear. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 205:1, pages 45.e1-45.e9.
Crossref
Muhammad Fawzy & Khaled Zalata. (2010) Late post‐cesarean surgical complication. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 36:3, pages 544-549.
Crossref
Stuart HOWELL, Trisha JOHNSTON & Sue‐Lynne MACLEOD. (2009) Trends and determinants of caesarean sections births in Queensland, 1997–2006. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 49:6, pages 606-611.
Crossref
Sukrutha Veerareddy, Asma Khalil & Patrick O'Brien. (2009) Obesity: implications for labour and puerperium. British Journal of Midwifery 17:6, pages 360-362.
Crossref
Ali Gedikbasi, Alpaslan Akyol, Emel Asar, Banu Bingol, Remzi Uncu, Akif Sargin & Yavuz Ceylan. (2008) Re-laparotomy after cesarean section: operative complications in surgical delivery. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 278:5, pages 419-425.
Crossref
A Sherrard, RW Platt, D Vallerand, RH Usher, X Zhang & MS Kramer. (2007) Maternal anthropometric risk factors for caesarean delivery before or after onset of labour. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 114:9, pages 1088-1096.
Crossref
Jennifer Fenwick, Jenny Gamble & Yvonne Hauck. (2007) Believing in birth – choosing VBAC: the childbirth expectations of a self‐selected cohort of Australian women. Journal of Clinical Nursing 16:8, pages 1561-1570.
Crossref
Sudha Xirasagar & Herng-Ching Lin. (2007) Maternal request CS—Role of hospital teaching status and for-profit ownership. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 132:1, pages 27-34.
Crossref
Jane J. Weaver, Helen Statham & Martin Richards. (2007) Are There “Unnecessary” Cesarean Sections? Perceptions of Women and Obstetricians About Cesarean Sections for Nonclinical Indications. Birth 34:1, pages 32-41.
Crossref
C.O. Chigbu, I.V. Ezeome & G.C. Iloabachie. (2006) Cesarean section on request in a developing country. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 96:1, pages 54-56.
Crossref
Madge E. Buus-Frank. (2005) THE GREAT IMPOSTER. Advances in Neonatal Care 5:5, pages 233-236.
Crossref
Chai Soon Park, Soon Gyo Yeoum & Euy Soon Choi. (2005) Study of subjectivity in the perception of cesarean birth. Nursing & Health Sciences 7:1, pages 3-8.
Crossref
J.D. Seffah. (2005) Re‐laparotomy after Cesarean section. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 88:3, pages 253-257.
Crossref
Assaf Ben-Meir, Joseph G. Schenker & Yossef Ezra. (2005) Cesarean section upon request: is it appropriate for everybody?. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 33:2.
Crossref
Sang‐Il Lee, Young‐Ho Khang & Moo‐Song Lee. (2004) Women's Attitudes Toward Mode of Delivery in South Korea—a Society with High Cesarean Section Rates. Birth 31:2, pages 108-116.
Crossref
Serena Donati, Michele E. Grandolfo & Silvia Andreozzi. (2003) Do Italian Mothers Prefer Cesarean Delivery?. Birth 30:2, pages 89-93.
Crossref
Joanne Morrison & I.Z. MacKenzie. (2003) Cesarean section on demand. Seminars in Perinatology 27:1, pages 20-33.
Crossref
Linda Yin King Lee, Eleanor Holroyd & Chun Yuen Ng. (2001) Exploring factors influencing Chinese women's decision to have elective caesarean surgery. Midwifery 17:4, pages 314-322.
Crossref
Jenny A Gamble & Debra K Creedy. (2003) Women's Preference for a Cesarean Section: Incidence and Associated Factors. Birth 28:2, pages 101-110.
Crossref
M.S. Robson. (2001) Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 15:1, pages 179-194.
Crossref
N Jackson & S Paterson-Brown. (2001) Physical sequelae of caesarean section. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 15:1, pages 49-61.
Crossref
Jenny A Gamble & Debra K Creedy. (2001) Women's Request For a Cesarean Section: A Critique of the Literature. Birth 27:4, pages 256-263.
Crossref
Lesley Page. (1999) Caesarean birth: the kindest cut?. British Journal of Midwifery 7:5, pages 296-296.
Crossref
Julie A. QuinlivanMRACOGMRACOG, Rodney W. PetersenMRACOGMRACOG & Christopher N. NicholsFRACOGFRACOG. (2008) Patient Preference the Leading Indication for Elective Caesarean Section in Public Patients‐Results of a 2‐year Prospective Audit in a Teaching Hospital. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 39:2, pages 207-214.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.