Citations (43)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (2)
F. Luna, A. Valls & A. Fernández-Santander. (1998) Inbreeding incidence on biological fitness in an isolated mediterranean population: La Alta Alpujarra Oriental (southeastern Spain). Annals of Human Biology 25:6, pages 589-596.
Read now
Read now
S.A. Shami, T. Qadeer, L.H. Schmitt & A.H. Bittles. (1991) Consanguinity, gestational period and anthropometric measurements at birth in Pakistan. Annals of Human Biology 18:6, pages 523-527.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (41)
Rasha R. Bayoumi, Lisa Hurt, Ning Zhang, Yin Jun Law, Christos Venetis, Human M. Fatem, Gamal I. Serour, Sheryl van der Poel & Jacky Boivin. (2024) A critical systematic review and meta-analyses of risk factors for fertility problems in a globalized world. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 48:3, pages 103217.
Crossref
Crossref
Muhammad Riaz Khan, Arvand Akbari, Thomas J. Nicholas, Helen Castillo‐Madeen, Muhammad Ajmal, Taqweem Ul Haq, Maris Laan, Aaron R. Quinlan, Jasvinder S. Ahuja, Aftab Ali Shah & Donald F. Conrad. (2023)
Genome sequencing of Pakistani families with male infertility identifies deleterious genotypes in
SPAG6
,
CCDC9
,
TKTL1
,
TUBA3C
, and
M1AP
. Andrology.
Crossref
Crossref
Sarosh Iqbal, Rubeena Zakar, Florian Fischer & Muhammad Zakria Zakar. (2022) Consanguineous marriages and their association with women’s reproductive health and fertility behavior in Pakistan: secondary data analysis from Demographic and Health Surveys, 1990–2018. BMC Women's Health 22:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Olubunmi Oniya, Karen Neves, Badreldeen Ahmed & Justin C. Konje. (2019) A review of the reproductive consequences of consanguinity. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 232, pages 87-96.
Crossref
Crossref
Helen Baykara-Krumme & Nadja Milewski. (2017) Fertility Patterns Among Turkish Women in Turkey and Abroad: The Effects of International Mobility, Migrant Generation, and Family Background. European Journal of Population 33:3, pages 409-436.
Crossref
Crossref
A.H. Bittles & M.L. Black. (2010) Consanguineous Marriage and Human Evolution. Annual Review of Anthropology 39:1, pages 193-207.
Crossref
Crossref
Rafat Hussain. 2004. Genetic Disorders of the Indian Subcontinent. Genetic Disorders of the Indian Subcontinent
125
135
.
AH Bittles. (2007) Consanguineous marriage and childhood health. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 45:8, pages 571-576.
Crossref
Crossref
AH Bittles. (2008) Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics. Clinical Genetics 60:2, pages 89-98.
Crossref
Crossref
Z Rahman, T Afroze & BS Weir. (2001) DNA Typing Results from Two Urban Subpopulations of Pakistan. Journal of Forensic Sciences 46:1, pages 111-115.
Crossref
Crossref
M A el-Hazmi, A R al-Swailem, A S Warsy, A M al-Swailem, R Sulaimani & A A al-Meshari. (1995) Consanguinity among the Saudi Arabian population.. Journal of Medical Genetics 32:8, pages 623-626.
Crossref
Crossref
E. TUNÇBÍLEK & I. KOC. (2007) Consanguineous marriage in Turkey and its impact on fertility and mortality. Annals of Human Genetics 58:4, pages 321-329.
Crossref
Crossref
A. H. Bittles, S. A. Shami & N. Appaji Rao. 1992. Minority Populations. Minority Populations
102
118
.
Nancy Wilmsen Thornhill. (2011) Mental mechanisms underlying inbreeding rule making. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 281-293.
Crossref
Crossref
Margo Wilson & Martin Daly. (2011) The metaphorical extension of “incest”: A human universal?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 280-281.
Crossref
Crossref
Eckart Voland. (2011) Rules regulating inbreeding, cultural variability and the great heuristic problem of evolutionary anthropology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 279-280.
Crossref
Crossref
David H. Spain. (2011) Muddled theory and misinterpreted data: Comments on yet another attempt to identify a so-called Westermarck effect and, in the process, to refute Freud. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 278-279.
Crossref
Crossref
P. A. Russell. (2011) Evolutionary theories must fit the data better than other theories. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 277-278.
Crossref
Crossref
Robert A. Paul. (2011) Psychoanalytic theory and incest avoidance rules. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 276-277.
Crossref
Crossref
Jim Moore. (2011) Another definition of “human” falls. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 275-276.
Crossref
Crossref
John Money. (2011) Correlation is not causation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 275-275.
Crossref
Crossref
Karin C. Meiselman. (2011) Beyond the Westermarck effect: The role of denial and nurturant bonding in incest avoidance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 274-275.
Crossref
Crossref
Kathleen M. MacQueen. (2011) Power as a contextual variable in the analysis of human inbreeding rules. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 273-274.
Crossref
Crossref
Frank B. Livingstone. (2011) What happened to the universality of the incest taboo?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 273-273.
Crossref
Crossref
Gregory C. Leavitt. (2011) Evolutionary analysis: Biological or cultural?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 272-273.
Crossref
Crossref
Paul Kline. (2011) Evolutionary analysis: Antithetical or irrelevant to psychoanalytic theory?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 271-272.
Crossref
Crossref
Michael E. Hyland. (2011) What were the incest rules of the Upper Paleolithic People? Putting evolution into an evolutionary analysis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 271-271.
Crossref
Crossref
Katherine L. Hann. (2011) The nature of the data. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 270-271.
Crossref
Crossref
Sam Glucksberg. (2011) Rules regulating inbreeding and marriage: Evolutionary or socioeconomic?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 269-270.
Crossref
Crossref
Daniel G. Freedman. (2011) On incestuous attraction and natural selection between populations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 269-269.
Crossref
Crossref
R. I. M. Dunbar. (2011) Marriage rules in perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 268-269.
Crossref
Crossref
Malcom M. Dow & Gregory B. Pollock. (2011) Galton's problem for strict adaptationists. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 267-268.
Crossref
Crossref
Wim E. Crusio. (2011) No evolution without genetic variation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 267-267.
Crossref
Crossref
James F. Crow. (2011) Deleterious versus beneficial effects of inbreeding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 266-266.
Crossref
Crossref
Ray H. Bixler. (2011) Multiple causes, eye witnesses and imaginative fertility. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 265-266.
Crossref
Crossref
A. H. Bittles. (2011) Societal stratification, consanguinity and fertility. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 264-265.
Crossref
Crossref
Laura Betzig. (2011) A little more mortar for a firm foundation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 264-264.
Crossref
Crossref
Stephen Beckerman. (2011) The cross cultural method and the incest taboo. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 263-264.
Crossref
Crossref
Jerome H. Barkow. (2011) Evolved self-interest and the cross-cultural survey. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 261-263.
Crossref
Crossref
Nancy Wilmsen Thornhill. (2011) An evolutionary analysis of rules regulating human inbreeding and marriage. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:2, pages 247-261.
Crossref
Crossref
Alan H. Bittles, William M. Mason, Jennifer Greene & N. Appaji Rao. (1991) Reproductive Behavior and Health in Consanguineous Marriages. Science 252:5007, pages 789-794.
Crossref
Crossref