126
Views
52
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Models for the prediction of successful induction of labor based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length

, , &
Pages 315-322 | Published online: 07 Jul 2009

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (4)

Seçil Karaca Kurtulmuş, Ibrahim Omeroglu & Mustafa Sengul. (2023) Can transvaginal cervical length and cervical strain elastography predict mid-trimester medical induction to abortion intervals?. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 28:3, pages 192-197.
Read now
Rupsa C. Boelig, Anju Suhag, Juliana Guarente, Kelly Orzechowski & Vincenzo Berghella. (2018) Second-trimester cervical length and outcomes of induction of labor at term. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 31:8, pages 1040-1044.
Read now
A. Keepanasseril, V. Suri, R. Bagga & N. Aggarwal. (2012) A new objective scoring system for the prediction of successful induction of labour. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 32:2, pages 145-147.
Read now
Torbjørn M. Eggebø, Inger Økland, Claudia Heien, Leif K. Gjessing, Pål Romundstad & Kjell Å. Salvesen. (2009) Can ultrasound measurements replace digitally assessed elements of the Bishop score?. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 88:3, pages 325-331.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (48)

Chutinun Leelarujijaroen, Ninlapa Pruksanusak, Alan Geater, Thitima Suntharasaj, Chitkasaem Suwanrath & Savitree Pranpanus. (2023) A predictive model for successfully inducing active labor among pregnant women: Combining cervical status assessment and clinical characteristics. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X 18, pages 100196.
Crossref
Sana Usman, Arwa Hanidu, Mariya Kovalenko, Wassim A. Hassan & Christoph Lees. (2023) The sonopartogram. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Crossref
Manisha Dorwal, Garima Yadav, Pratibha Singh, Priyanka Kathuria, Meenakshi Gothwal, Navdeep Kaur Ghuman & Shashank Shekhar. (2022) Deriving a prediction model for emergency cesarean delivery following induction of labor in singleton term pregnancies. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 160:2, pages 698-706.
Crossref
Dominic Gabriel Iliescu, Smaranda Belciug, Renato Constantin Ivanescu, Roxana Cristina Dragusin, Monica Laura Cara & Dira Laurentiu. (2022) Prediction of labor outcome pilot study: evaluation of primiparous women at term. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM 4:6, pages 100711.
Crossref
Pratima Mittal, Jyotsna Suri, Divya Pandey, Suchandana Dasgupta, Rekha Bharti & Megha Mittal. (2022) Fetal Head–Perineum Distance on Transperineal Ultrasound as Predictor of Vaginal Delivery in Term Nulliparous Women Undergoing Induction of Labor. Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 16:3, pages 174-180.
Crossref
N López‐Jiménez, F García‐Sánchez, R Hernández‐Pailos, V Rodrigo‐Álvaro, A Pascual‐Pedreño, M Moreno‐Cid, M Delgado‐Rodríguez & A Hernández‐Martínez. (2021) Risk of caesarean delivery in labour induction: a systematic review and external validation of predictive models. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 129:5, pages 685-695.
Crossref
Zainab Hananah Abang Abdullah, Kah Teik Chew, V. Ramesh V. Velayudham, Zainab Yahaya, Amilia Afzan Mohd Jamil, Muhammad Azrai Abu, Nur Azurah Abdul Ghani & Nor Azlin Mohamed Ismail. (2022) Pre-induction cervical assessment using transvaginal ultrasound versus Bishops cervical scoring as predictors of successful induction of labour in term pregnancies: A hospital-based comparative clinical trial. PLOS ONE 17:1, pages e0262387.
Crossref
Rasha Kamel, Francisca S. Molina Garcia, Liona C. Poon & Aly Youssef. (2021) The usefulness of ultrasound before induction of labor. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM 3:6, pages 100423.
Crossref
Rasha A. Kamel, Sherif M. Negm, Aly Youssef, Luca Bianchini, Elena Brunelli, Gianluigi Pilu, Mahmoud Soliman & Kypros H. Nicolaides. (2021) Predicting cesarean delivery for failure to progress as an outcome of labor induction in term singleton pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 224:6, pages 609.e1-609.e11.
Crossref
Ji Young Kwon, Jeong Ha Wie, Sae Kyung Choi, Seonghye Park, Su Mi Kim & In Yang Park. (2021) The degree of cervical length shortening as a predictor of successful or failed labor induction. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 60:3, pages 503-508.
Crossref
Enrico Marinelli, Renata Beck, Michael Stark & Simona Zaami. 2021. Intrapartum Ultrasonography for Labor Management. Intrapartum Ultrasonography for Labor Management 669 685 .
György Léhner, Philipp Reif, Alexander Avian, Martina Kollmann, Ioana-Claudia Lakovschek, Uwe Lang & Daniela Ulrich. (2019) Does third trimester cervical length predict duration of first stage of labor?. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 131:19-20, pages 468-474.
Crossref
Lei Zhao, Ying Lin, Tingting Jiang, Ling Wang, Min Li, Ying Wang, Guoqiang Sun & Mei Xiao. (2019) Prediction of the induction to delivery time interval in vaginal dinoprostone-induced labor: a retrospective study in a Chinese tertiary maternity hospital. Journal of International Medical Research 47:6, pages 2647-2654.
Crossref
Liran Hiersch, Adi Borovich, Rinat Gabbay-Benziv, Moria Maimon-Cohen, Amir Aviram, Yariv Yogev & Eran Ashwal. (2016) Can we predict successful cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 vaginal inserts?. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 295:2, pages 343-349.
Crossref
Nada Aracic, Ivica Stipic, Ivana Jakus Alujevic, Petar Poljak & Mario Stipic. (2017) The value of ultrasound measurement of cervical length and parity in prediction of cesarean section risk in term premature rupture of membranes and unfavorable cervix. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 45:1, pages 99-104.
Crossref
Soghra Khazardoost, Fahimeh Ghotbizadeh Vahdani, Sahar Latifi, Sedighe Borna, Maryam Tahani, Mohammad Ali Rezaei & Masoomeh Shafaat. (2016) Pre-induction translabial ultrasound measurements in predicting mode of delivery compared to bishop score: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 16:1.
Crossref
Bo Ryoung Han, Kyo Hoon Park, Sung Youn Lee, Eun Young Jung & Jeong Woo Park. (2016) Prediction of the risk of cesarean delivery after labor induction in twin gestations based on clinical and ultrasound parameters. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 42:9, pages 1125-1131.
Crossref
Soghra Khazardoost, Fahimeh Ghotbizadeh, Sahar Latifi, Maryam Tahani, Mohammad Ali Rezaei & Masoomeh Shafaat. (2016) The Predictive Value of Trans-Vaginal Ultrasound Measurements Compared with Bishop Score in Determining Successful Induction of Labor. Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research 1:2.
Crossref
M. Kehila, H.S. Abouda, K. Sahbi, H. Cheour & M. Badis Chanoufi. (2016) Ultrasound cervical length measurement in prediction of labor induction outcome. Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine 9:2, pages 127-131.
Crossref
Orly Lavee & Giselle Kidson-Gerber. (2016) Update on inherited disorders of haemostasis and pregnancy. Obstetric Medicine 9:2, pages 64-72.
Crossref
Antonio Hernández-Martínez, Ana I. Pascual-Pedreño, Ana B. Baño-Garnés, María R. Melero-Jiménez, José M. Tenías-Burillo & Milagros Molina-Alarcón. (2015) Predictive model for risk of cesarean section in pregnant women after induction of labor. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 293:3, pages 529-538.
Crossref
C. Emily Kleinrouweler, Fiona M. Cheong-See, Gary S. Collins, Anneke Kwee, Shakila Thangaratinam, Khalid S. Khan, Ben Willem J. Mol, Eva Pajkrt, Karel G.M. Moons & Ewoud Schuit. (2016) Prognostic models in obstetrics: available, but far from applicable. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 214:1, pages 79-90.e36.
Crossref
Karin van der Tuuk, Maria G. van Pampus, Corine M. Koopmans, Jan G. Aarnoudse, Paul P. van den Berg, Johannes J. van Beek, Frans J.A. Copraij, Gunilla Kleiverda, Martina Porath, Robbert J.P. Rijnders, Paulien C.M. van der Salm, Leonard P. Morssink, Rob H. Stigter, Ben W.J. Mol & Henk Groen. (2015) Prediction of cesarean section risk in women with gestational hypertension or mild preeclampsia at term. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 191, pages 23-27.
Crossref
Ifeanyichukwu U Ezebialu, Ahizechukwu C Eke, George U Eleje & Chukwuemeka E Nwachukwu. (2015) Methods for assessing pre-induction cervical ripening. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Crossref
Núria Baños, Federico Migliorelli, Eduardo Posadas, Janisse Ferreri & Montse Palacio. (2015) Definition of Failed Induction of Labor and Its Predictive Factors: Two Unsolved Issues of an Everyday Clinical Situation. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 38:3, pages 161-169.
Crossref
Jessica Papillon-Smith & Haim A. Abenhaim. (2014) The role of sonographic cervical length in labor induction at term. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, pages n/a-n/a.
Crossref
Howard Berger & Nir Melamed. (2014) Timing of delivery in women with diabetes in pregnancy. Obstetric Medicine 7:1, pages 8-16.
Crossref
Ifeanyichukwu U Ezebialu, Ahizechukwu C Eke, George U Eleje & Chukwuemeka E Nwachukwu. 1996. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Adelaide Cubal, Joana Carvalho, Maria João Ferreira, Graça Rodrigues & Olímpia Do Carmo. (2013) Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 39:9, pages 1391-1396.
Crossref
Han Sung Hwang, In Sook Sohn & Han Sung Kwon. (2013) Imaging Analysis of Cervical Elastography for Prediction of Successful Induction of Labor at Term. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 32:6, pages 937-946.
Crossref
Dominic Iliescu, Aris Antsaklis, Daniela Paulescu, Alexandru Comanescu, Stefania Tudorache, Iuliana Ceausu, Liliana Novac & Nicolae Cernea. (2013) Applications of Ultrasound in Prelabor and Labor. Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 6:3, pages 257-269.
Crossref
R. Levy, S. Zaks, A. Ben-Arie, S. Perlman, Z. Hagay & E. Vaisbuch. (2012) Can angle of progression in pregnant women before onset of labor predict mode of delivery?. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 40:3, pages 332-337.
Crossref
Ana María Gómez-Laencina, Cristina Pages García, Laura Villanueva Asensio, Jose Andrés Guijarro Ponce, Monserrat Solera Martínez & Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno. (2011) Sonographic cervical length as a predictor of type of delivery after induced labor. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 285:6, pages 1523-1528.
Crossref
Wataru Isono, Takeshi Nagamatsu, Yukari Uemura, Tomoyuki Fujii, Hironobu Hyodo, Takahiro Yamashita, Yoshimasa Kamei, Shiro Kozuma & Yuji Taketani. (2011) Prediction model for the incidence of emergent cesarean section during induction of labor specialized in nulliparous low-risk women. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 37:12, pages 1784-1791.
Crossref
F. Y. HUQ & R. A. KADIR. (2011) Management of pregnancy, labour and delivery in women with inherited bleeding disorders. Haemophilia 17, pages 20-30.
Crossref
W. S. Kang, K. H. Park, S. N. Kim, D. M. Shin, J.-S. Hong & H. J. Jung. (2010) Degree of cervical shortening after initial induction of labor as a predictor of subsequent successful induction. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 36:6, pages 749-754.
Crossref
Ralph NADER, Ka Lai SHEK & Hans Peter DIETZ. (2010) Predicting the outcome of induction of labour. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 50:4, pages 329-333.
Crossref
C. J. M. Verhoeven, A. Oudenaarden, M. A. A. Hermus, M. M. Porath, S. G. Oei & B. W. J. Mol. (2009) Validation of models that predict Cesarean section after induction of labor. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 34:3, pages 316-321.
Crossref
M. Meijer-Hoogeveen, C. Roos, B. Arabin, P. Stoutenbeek & G. H. A. Visser. (2009) Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 33:2, pages 213-220.
Crossref
Kyo-Hoon Park, Joon-Seok Hong, Woong-Sun Kang, Dong-Myung Shin & Shi-Nae Kim. (2009) Body mass index, Bishop score, and sonographic measurement of the cervical length as predictors of successful labor induction in twin gestations. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 37:5.
Crossref
T. M. Eggebø, C. Heien, I. Økland, L. K. Gjessing, P. Romundstad & K. Å. Salvesen. (2008) Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 32:2, pages 199-204.
Crossref
Ann S. Hatfield, Luis Sanchez-Ramos & Andrew M. Kaunitz. (2008) Reply. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 199:1, pages e16-e17.
Crossref
H.M. Tanir, T. Sener & Z. Yildiz. (2008) Digital and transvaginal ultrasound cervical assessment for prediction of successful labor induction. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 100:1, pages 52-55.
Crossref
L L Tolaymat, V H Gonzalez-Quintero, L Sanchez-Ramos, A Kaunitz, P Wludyka, M J O'Sullivan & D Martin. (2007) Cervical length and the risk of spontaneous labor at term. Journal of Perinatology 27:12, pages 749-753.
Crossref
Ann S. Hatfield, Luis Sanchez-Ramos & Andrew M. Kaunitz. (2007) Sonographic cervical assessment to predict the success of labor induction: a systematic review with metaanalysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 197:2, pages 186-192.
Crossref
Ali Yanik, Çagri Gülümser & Miraç Tosun. (2007) Ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length in predicting mode of delivery after oxytocin induction. Advances in Therapy 24:4, pages 748-756.
Crossref
P. C. Tan, N. Vallikkannu, S. Suguna, K. F. Quek & J. Hassan. (2007) Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 29:5, pages 568-573.
Crossref
Peng Chiong TAN, Subramaniam SUGUNA, Narayanan VALLIKKANNU & Jamiyah HASSAN. (2006) Ultrasound and clinical predictors for Caesarean delivery after labour induction at term. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 46:6, pages 505-509.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.