70
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

A prospective randomized comparison of left and right radial approach for percutaneous coronary angiography in Asian populations

, , , , &
Pages 963-968 | Published online: 20 Jun 2014

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (1)

Qiang Fu, Hongyu Hu, Dezhao Wang, Wei Chen, Zhixu Tan, Qun Li & Buxing Chen. (2015) Randomized comparative study of left versus right radial approach in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Clinical Interventions in Aging 10, pages 1003-1008.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (11)

C. Mantis, E. Papadakis, A. Anadiotis, N. Kafkas & S. Patsilinakos. (2022) Factors affecting radiation exposure during transradial cardiac catheterisation and percutaneous coronary intervention. Clinical Radiology 77:5, pages e387-e393.
Crossref
Young Jin Youn, Dong-Hyuk Choi, Young Jun Park, Jung-Woo Son, Jun-Won Lee, Min-Soo Ahn, Sung Gyun Ahn, Jang-Young Kim, Byung-Su Yoo, Seung-Hwan Lee & Junghan Yoon. (2022) Right Versus Left Radial Artery Access for Coronary Procedures: Efficacy Is More Dependent on an Operator Proficiency Than on the Access Site Selection. Journal of Cardiovascular Intervention 1:3, pages 115.
Crossref
Jordan G. Safirstein. (2020) Optimizing Transradial Access. Interventional Cardiology Clinics 9:1, pages 99-105.
Crossref
Yakup Balaban. (2018) Effectiveness of a handmade “New Carotid Catheter” in transradial carotid angiography: A comparison with conventional multipurpose catheters. Journal of Interventional Cardiology 31:1, pages 94-105.
Crossref
George Hahalis, Konstantinos Aznaouridis, Gregory Tsigkas, Periklis Davlouros, Ioanna Xanthopoulou, Nikolaos Koutsogiannis, Ioanna Koniari, Marianna Leopoulou, Olivier Costerousse, Dimitris Tousoulis & Olivier F. Bertrand. (2017) Radial Artery and Ulnar Artery Occlusions Following Coronary Procedures and the Impact of Anticoagulation: ARTEMIS (Radial and Ulnar ARTE ry Occlusion M eta‐Analys IS ) Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis . Journal of the American Heart Association 6:8.
Crossref
Konstantinos V. Voudris, Martha Habibi, Panagiotis Karyofillis & Mladen I. Vidovich. (2016) Radiation Exposures Associated With Radial and Femoral Coronary Interventions. Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine 18:12.
Crossref
Rachit M. Shah, Dhavalkumar Patel, Antonio Abbate, Michael J. Cowley & Ion S. Jovin. (2016) Comparison of transradial coronary procedures via right radial versus left radial artery approach: A meta-analysis. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 88:7, pages 1027-1033.
Crossref
Yusuke Adachi, Kenichi Sakakura, Hiroshi Wada, Hiroshi Funayama, Tomio Umemoto, Shin-ichi Momomura & Hideo Fujita. (2016) Predictors of prolonged fluoroscopy time in diagnostic coronary angiography. Journal of Cardiology 68:1, pages 37-42.
Crossref
Pasupati Rajoria, Chenghong Xu, Yunfeng Zhang, Wenjun Guan, Hua Yang & Keping Yang. (2016) Left Radial Approach versus Right Radial Approach of Coronary Angiography in the Diagnosis of Coronary Heart Disease. World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases 06:08, pages 265-274.
Crossref
S.L. Xia, X.B. Zhang, J.S. Zhou & X. Gao. (2015) Comparative efficacy and safety of the left versus right radial approach for percutaneous coronary procedures: a meta-analysis including 6870 patients. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 48:8, pages 743-750.
Crossref
Stefano Rigattieri, Cristian Di Russo, Maria Cera, Silvio Fedele, Alessandro Sciahbasi & Francesco Rocco Pugliese. (2015) Patient radiation exposure in right versus left trans-radial approach for coronary procedures. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 16:1, pages 15-19.
Crossref