25
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Attitudes towards disabled persons and the possible effects of prenatal diagnosis. An interview study among 53 women participating in prenatal diagnosis and 20 of their husbands

&
Pages 187-196 | Received 10 Apr 1986, Accepted 15 Sep 1986, Published online: 07 Jul 2009

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (5)

Kristina Holmgren & Nils Uddenberg. (1994) Abortion ethics - women's post abortion assessments. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 73:6, pages 492-496.
Read now
Theresa M. Marteau. (1991) Psychological Aspects of Prenatal Testing for Fetal Abnormalities. The Irish Journal of Psychology 12:2, pages 121-132.
Read now
Berit Sjögren, Lars Marsk & Berit Sjøgren. (1989) Information on Prenatal Diagnosis at the Antenatal Clinic: The Women's Experiences. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 68:1, pages 35-40.
Read now
Berit Sjögren. (1988) Parental Attitudes to Prenatal Information About the Sex of the Fetus. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 67:1, pages 43-46.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (10)

Elisa García, Danielle R. M. Timmermans & Evert van Leeuwen. (2008) Rethinking autonomy in the context of prenatal screening decision‐making. Prenatal Diagnosis 28:2, pages 115-120.
Crossref
Regina Kenen, Ann C. M. Smith, Carolee Watkins & Carol Zuber-Pittore. (2000) To Use or Not to Use: Male Partners' Perspectives on Decision Making About Prenatal Diagnosis. Journal of Genetic Counseling 9:1, pages 33-45.
Crossref
M.M Vergeer, F van Balen & E Ketting. (1998) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis as an alternative to amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: psychosocial and ethical aspects. Patient Education and Counseling 35:1, pages 5-13.
Crossref
Ivana Marková. (1995) Choice, responsibility and ethics. Clinical Psychology Forum 1:80, pages 17-22.
Crossref
Gavin Mooney & Mette Lange. (1993) Ante-natal screening: What constitutes ‘benefit’?. Social Science & Medicine 37:7, pages 873-878.
Crossref
Berit Sjögren. (2005) Future use and development of prenatal diagnosis. Consumers' attitudes. Prenatal Diagnosis 12:1, pages 1-8.
Crossref
T. M. Marteau. 1991. Antenatal Diagnosis of Fetal Abnormalities. Antenatal Diagnosis of Fetal Abnormalities 243 254 .
Berit Sjögren & Nils Uddenberg. (2005) Prenatal diagnosis for psychological reasons: Comparison with other indications, advanced maternal age and known genetic risk. Prenatal Diagnosis 10:2, pages 111-120.
Crossref
B. Sjögren & N. Uddenberg. (1989) Prenatal diagnosis and psychological distress: Amniocentesis or chorionic villus biopsy?. Prenatal Diagnosis 9:7, pages 477-487.
Crossref
Berit Sjögren & Nils Uddenberg. (1988) Decision making during the prenatal diagnostic procedure. A questionnaire and interview study of 211 women participating in prenatal diagnosis. Prenatal Diagnosis 8:4, pages 263-273.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.