Citations (13)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (9)
Fátima Palma, Ana Rosa Costa, Joaquim Neves, Amália Pacheco, M. Céu Almeida, Teresa Bombas & Daniel P. Silva. (2023) Perception of oral contraception – do women think differently from gynaecologists?. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 28:2, pages 125-131.
Read now
Read now
Iñaki Lete, Maialen Pérez de Arrilucea, María Rodríguez & Eskerne Bello. (2014) Efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the etonogestrel and ethinyl estradiol vaginal ring. Open Access Journal of Contraception 5, pages 39-48.
Read now
Read now
Arie Yeshaya, Amos Ber, Daniel S Seidman & Bjorn J Oddens. (2014) Influence of structured counseling on women’s selection of hormonal contraception in Israel: results of the CHOICE study. International Journal of Women's Health 6, pages 799-808.
Read now
Read now
Johannes Bitzer, Vladimir Cupanik, Tomas Fait, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson, Paul Grob, Björn J. Oddens, Leszek Pawelczyk & Vit Unzeitig. (2013) Factors influencing women's selection of combined hormonal contraceptive methods after counselling in 11 countries: Results from a subanalysis of the CHOICE study. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 18:5, pages 372-380.
Read now
Read now
Edith Weisberg, Deborah Bateson, Stephanie Knox, Marion Haas, Rosalie Viney, Deborah Street & Denzil Fiebig. (2013) Do women and providers value the same features of contraceptive products? Results of a best-worst stated preference experiment. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 18:3, pages 181-190.
Read now
Read now
Frans J. M. E. Roumen & Daniel R. Mishell$suffix/text()$suffix/text(). (2012) The contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing®, a decade after its introduction. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 17:6, pages 415-427.
Read now
Read now
Claudia Vogt & Marion Schaefer. (2012) Knowledge matters – Impact of two types of information brochure on contraceptive knowledge, attitudes and intentions. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 17:2, pages 135-143.
Read now
Read now
Teresa Bombas, Ana Rosa Costa, Fátima Palma, Lisa Vicente, José Luís Sá, Ana Maria Nogueira & Sofia Andrade. (2012) Knowledge-attitude-practice survey among Portuguese gynaecologists regarding combined hormonal contraceptives methods. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 17:2, pages 128-134.
Read now
Read now
Johannes Bitzer, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson, Frans Roumen, Maya Marintcheva-Petrova, Bas van Bakel & Björn J. Oddens. (2012) The CHOICE study: Effect of counselling on the selection of combined hormonal contraceptive methods in 11 countries. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 17:1, pages 65-78.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (4)
Ping Teresa Yeh, Hunied Kautsar, Caitlin E Kennedy & Mary E Gaffield. (2022) Values and preferences for contraception: A global systematic review. Contraception 111, pages 3-21.
Crossref
Crossref
Filippo Maria Nimbi, Roberta Rossi, Francesca Tripodi, Kevan Wylie & Chiara Simonelli. (2019) A Biopsychosocial Model for the Counseling of Hormonal Contraceptives: A Review of the Psychological, Relational, Sexual, and Cultural Elements Involved in the Choice of Contraceptive Method. Sexual Medicine Reviews 7:4, pages 587-596.
Crossref
Crossref
Paula Gomes Alves, Irene Petersen & Fiona Stevenson. (2019) Searching for Information on the Risks of Combined Hormonal Contraceptives on the Internet: A Qualitative Study Across Six European Countries. Journal of Medical Internet Research 21:3, pages e10810.
Crossref
Crossref
Kirk D Wyatt, Ryan T Anderson, Douglas Creedon, Victor M Montori, John Bachman, Patricia Erwin & Annie LeBlanc. (2014) Women’s values in contraceptive choice: a systematic review of relevant attributes included in decision aids. BMC Women's Health 14:1.
Crossref
Crossref