481
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Do women and providers value the same features of contraceptive products? Results of a best-worst stated preference experiment

, , , , , & show all
Pages 181-190 | Published online: 04 Apr 2013

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (5)

Marion Haas, Jody Church, Deborah J. Street, Deborah Bateson, Jane Fisher, Angela Taft, Kirsten I. Black, Jayne Lucke, Safeera Y. Hussainy, Kevin McGeechan, Wendy Norman & Danielle Mazza. (2022) The preferences of women in Australia for the features of long-acting reversible contraception: results of a discrete choice experiment. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 27:5, pages 424-430.
Read now
I. Piva, F. Brusca, F. Tassinati, S. Bonipozzi, A. Palano, M. T. Sassi, G. Bonaccorsi, D. Morano, R. Martinello, G. Scutiero, U. Indraccolo & P. Greco. (2019) Post-abortion long-acting reversible contraception in a sample of Italian women: intrauterine device versus subdermal implant. Gynecological Endocrinology 35:5, pages 427-433.
Read now
Jennifer Bracken & Cynthia A. Graham. (2014) Young women's attitudes towards, and experiences of, long-acting reversible contraceptives. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 19:4, pages 276-284.
Read now
Marte Bratlie, Trine Aarvold, Elling Skeide Skårn, Jonas Andre Lundekvam, Britt-Ingjerd Nesheim & Erik Tandberg Askevold. (2014) Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents and young adults – A cross-sectional study of women and general practitioners in Oslo, Norway. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 19:3, pages 194-202.
Read now
Iñaki Lete & Ezequiel Pérez-Campos. (2014) Differences in contraceptive use between Spanish female healthcare providers and Spanish women in the general population aged 23 to 49 years: the HABITS Study. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 19:3, pages 161-168.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (10)

Komal S. Soin, Ping Teresa Yeh, Mary E. Gaffield, Christina Ge & Caitlin E. Kennedy. (2022) Health workers’ values and preferences regarding contraceptive methods globally: A systematic review. Contraception 111, pages 61-70.
Crossref
Alida M. Gertz, Ahmad Syahir Mohd Soffi, Atlang Mompe, Ontiretse Sickboy, Averi N. Gaines, Rebecca Ryan, Aamirah Mussa, Caitlin Bawn, Robert Gallop, Chelsea Morroni & Paul Crits-Christoph. (2022) Developing an Assessment of Contraceptive Preferences in Botswana: Piloting a Novel Approach Using Best-Worst Scaling of Attributes. Frontiers in Global Women's Health 3.
Crossref
Rebecca L. Callahan, Aurélie Brunie, Victoria Lebrun, Mario Chen, Christine L. Godwin, Kanchan Lakhwani & Funmilola M. OlaOlorun. (2021) Optimizing the design of a contraceptive microarray patch: a discrete choice experiment on women’s preferences in India and Nigeria. Reproductive Health 18:1.
Crossref
Morgan M. PhilbinCarrigan ParishSadie BergenDeanna KerriganElizabeth N. KinnardSarah E. ReedMardge H. CohenOluwakemi SosanyaAnandi N. ShethAdaora A. AdimoraJennifer CocohobaLakshmi GoparajuElizabeth T. GolubMargaret FischlMaria L. AlcaideLisa R. Metsch. (2021) A Qualitative Exploration of Women's Interest in Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Therapy Across Six Cities in the Women's Interagency HIV Study: Intersections with Current and Past Injectable Medication and Substance Use. AIDS Patient Care and STDs 35:1, pages 23-30.
Crossref
Philippa Buckingham, Natalie Amos, Sajal Kumar Saha, Safeera Y Hussainy & Danielle Mazza. (2020) Contraception decision aids to improve care and effective method use. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Crossref
Hideo Aizaki & James Fogarty. (2019) An R package and tutorial for case 2 best–worst scaling. Journal of Choice Modelling 32, pages 100171.
Crossref
Marina A. S. Daniele, John Cleland, Lenka Benova & Moazzam Ali. (2017) Provider and lay perspectives on intra-uterine contraception: a global review. Reproductive Health 14:1.
Crossref
Christine Dehlendorf, Judith Fitzpatrick, Jody Steinauer, Lawrence Swiader, Kevin Grumbach, Cara Hall & Miriam Kuppermann. (2017) Development and field testing of a decision support tool to facilitate shared decision making in contraceptive counseling. Patient Education and Counseling 100:7, pages 1374-1381.
Crossref
Danielle Mazza, Deborah Bateson, Meredith Frearson, Philip Goldstone, Gab Kovacs & Rod Baber. (2017) Current barriers and potential strategies to increase the use of long‐acting reversible contraception (LARC) to reduce the rate of unintended pregnancies in Australia: An expert roundtable discussion. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 57:2, pages 206-212.
Crossref
Christine Dehlendorf, Edith Fox, Lauren Sobel & Sonya Borrero. (2016) Patient-Centered Contraceptive Counseling: Evidence to Inform Practice. Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports 5:1, pages 55-63.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.