Citations (36)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (4)
Kara K. Hoppe, Melissa A. Schiff, Suzanne E. Peterson & Michael G. Gravett. (2016) 30 mL Single- versus 80 mL double-balloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 29:12, pages 1919-1925.
Read now
Read now
Mohammed T. Gadel Rab, Abdel Baset F. Mohammed, Khalid A. Zahran, Mo’men M. Hassan, Abdel Razek M. Eldeen, Emad M. Ebrahim & Mohammed Yehia. (2015) Transcervical Foley’s catheter versus Cook balloon for cervical ripening in stillbirth with a scarred uterus: a randomized controlled trial. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 28:10, pages 1181-1185.
Read now
Read now
Asnat Walfisch, Elad Mei-Dan & Mordechai Hallak. (2015) Trans-cervical double balloon catheter with and without extra-amniotic saline infusion for cervical ripening: a prospective quasi-randomized trial. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 28:7, pages 848-853.
Read now
Read now
Elad Mei-Dan, Asnat Walfisch, Constanza Valencia & Mordechai Hallak. (2014) Making cervical ripening EASI: a prospective controlled comparison of single versus double balloon catheters. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 27:17, pages 1765-1770.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (32)
Kenji Imai, Yuki Nozaki, Takafumi Ushida, Sho Tano, Hiroaki Kajiyama & Tomomi Kotani. (2023)
Comparison of the efficacy between controlled‐release dinoprostone delivery system (
PROPESS
) and
Cook's
double balloon catheter plus oxytocin: A retrospective single‐center study in
Japan
. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 49:9, pages 2317-2323.
Crossref
Crossref
Maciej W. Socha, Wojciech Flis, Miłosz Pietrus, Mateusz Wartęga & Monika Szambelan. (2023) The 300 versus 300 Study—Low Volume versus High Volume Single Balloon Catheter for Induction of Labor: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine 12:14, pages 4839.
Crossref
Crossref
Marieke DT de Vaan, Mieke LG ten Eikelder, Marta Jozwiak, Kirsten R Palmer, Miranda Davies-Tuck, Kitty WM Bloemenkamp, Ben Willem J Mol & Michel Boulvain. (2023) Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2023:7.
Crossref
Crossref
Lindsey A. Roth, Elana Kreiger-Benson, Steven Friedman, Dana R. Gossett & Lisa Shanahan. (2023) Time from insertion to expulsion of cervical ripening balloon in preterm versus term inductions of labor. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Crossref
Crossref
Alicia Martínez-Varea, Andrea Santolaria-Baig, Carlos Sánchez-Ajenjo, Rogelio Monfort-Ortiz, Alfredo Perales-Marín & Vicente Diago-Almela. (2022) Mechanical cervical ripening for prolonged pregnancies with a previous cesarean section: Double-balloon catheter vs Foley catheter. Obstetrics & Gynecology International Journal 13:4, pages 212-216.
Crossref
Crossref
Sarah Waldron, Hannah Contziu, Olga Aleshin & Hala Phipps. (2022) A snapshot of women’s and clinicians’ perceptions of the double balloon catheter for induction of labor. European Journal of Midwifery 6:May, pages 1-6.
Crossref
Crossref
Patrick Omondi, Paul Nyongesa, Bett Kipchumba Chemalan & Peter Itsura. (2021) Low‐dose oxytocin as an adjunct to Foley catheter for cervical ripening in nulliparous women at MTRH, Eldoret, Kenya: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 157:2, pages 397-404.
Crossref
Crossref
Yang Huang Grace Ng, Anisa Aisyah Aminuddin, Toh Lick Tan, Ramesh Kuppusamy, Shephali Tagore & George Seow Heong Yeo. (2021) Multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing the safety in the first 12 h, efficacy and maternal satisfaction of a double balloon catheter and prostaglandin pessary for induction of labour. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 305:1, pages 11-18.
Crossref
Crossref
Mehmet Obut, Deniz Balsak, Kemal Sarsmaz, Harun E. Tolunay, Erol N. Varlı, Dilek Şahin & Aykan Yücel. (2021) Double Foley catheter for labor induction: An alternative method. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 155:3, pages 496-504.
Crossref
Crossref
Inna Bleicher, Elena Dikopoltsev, Einav Kadour-Ferro, Rami Sammour, Ron Gonen, Shlomi Sagi, Aya Eshel, Liraz Nussam & Dana Vitner. (2020) Double-Balloon Device for 6 Compared With 12 Hours for Cervical Ripening. Obstetrics & Gynecology 135:5, pages 1153-1160.
Crossref
Crossref
Xiyao Liu, Yu Wang, Fan Zhang, Xiaoni Zhong, Rong Ou, Xin Luo & Hongbo Qi. (2019) Double- versus single-balloon catheters for labour induction and cervical ripening: a meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 19:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Marieke DT de Vaan, Mieke LG ten Eikelder, Marta Jozwiak, Kirsten R Palmer, Miranda Davies-Tuck, Kitty WM Bloemenkamp, Ben Willem J Mol & Michel Boulvain. (2019) Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2019:10.
Crossref
Crossref
V. Pez, P. Deruelle, M. Kyheng, C. Boyon, E. Clouqueur & C. Garabedian. (2018) Republication de : Méthodes de maturation cervicale et déclenchement du travail : évaluation de la sonde simple ballonnet comparée à la sonde double ballonnet et aux prostaglandines. La Revue Sage-Femme 17:6, pages 279-284.
Crossref
Crossref
Gözde Demirezen, Berna Aslan Çetin, Begüm Aydoğan Mathyk, Nadiye Köroğlu & Gökhan Yildirim. (2018) Efficiency of the Foley catheter versus the double balloon catheter during the induction of second trimester pregnancy terminations: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 298:5, pages 881-887.
Crossref
Crossref
V. Pez, P. Deruelle, M. Kyheng, C. Boyon, E. Clouqueur & C. Garabedian. (2018) Méthodes de maturation cervicale et déclenchement du travail : évaluation de la sonde simple ballonnet comparée à la sonde double ballonnet et aux prostaglandines. Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie 46:7-8, pages 570-574.
Crossref
Crossref
Héctor Lajusticia, Samuel J. Martínez-Domínguez, Gonzalo R. Pérez-Roncero, Peter Chedraui & Faustino R. Pérez-López. (2018) Single versus double-balloon catheters for the induction of labor of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 297:5, pages 1089-1100.
Crossref
Crossref
Raed Salim, Naama Schwartz, Noah Zafran, Sivan Zuarez-Easton, Gali Garmi & Shabtai Romano. (2017) Comparison of single- and double-balloon catheters for labor induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Perinatology 38:3, pages 217-225.
Crossref
Crossref
Fang Yang, Shijin Huang, Yu Long & Lingling Huang. (2018) Double-balloon versus single-balloon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 44:1, pages 27-34.
Crossref
Crossref
Jip S.M. Gommers, Milou Diederen, Chris Wilkinson, Deborah Turnbull & Ben W.J. Mol. (2017) Risk of maternal, fetal and neonatal complications associated with the use of the transcervical balloon catheter in induction of labour: A systematic review. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 218, pages 73-84.
Crossref
Crossref
Aaron Goldberg. 2017. Obstetric Care. Obstetric Care
23
31
.
. 2017. Obstetric Care. Obstetric Care.
Samia Husain, Sonia Husain & Rubina Izhar. (2017) Retracted: Oral misoprostol alone versus oral misoprostol and Foley's catheter for induction of labor: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 43:8, pages 1270-1277.
Crossref
Crossref
Rohan Chodankar, Akanksha Sood & Janesh Gupta. (2017) An overview of the past, current and future trends for cervical ripening in induction of labour. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 19:3, pages 219-226.
Crossref
Crossref
Waleed Ali Sayed Ahmed, Zakia Mahdy Ibrahim, Osama Elsayed Ashor, Mariam Lotfi Mohamed, Magdy Refaat Ahmed & Amal Mohamed Elshahat. (2016) Use of the Foley catheter versus a double balloon cervical ripening catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening in postdate primigravidae. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 42:11, pages 1489-1494.
Crossref
Crossref
Sven Kehl, Christel Weiss & Werner Rath. (2016) Balloon catheters for induction of labor at term after previous cesarean section: a systematic review. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 204, pages 44-50.
Crossref
Crossref
Zarko Alfirevic, Edna Keeney, Therese Dowswell, Nicky J Welton, Nancy Medley, Sofia Dias, Leanne V Jones, Gillian Gyte & Deborah M Caldwell. (2016) Which method is best for the induction of labour? A systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technology Assessment 20:65, pages 1-584.
Crossref
Crossref
Saja Anabusi, Elad Mei-Dan, Mordechai Hallak & Asnat Walfisch. (2015) Mechanical labor induction in the obese population: a secondary analysis of a prospective randomized trial. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 293:1, pages 75-80.
Crossref
Crossref
Victoria Greenberg & Adeeb Khalifeh. (2015) Intracervical Foley balloon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: A review. Seminars in Perinatology 39:6, pages 441-443.
Crossref
Crossref
Rodney K. Edwards, Jeff M. Szychowski, Jessica L. Berger, Megan Petersen, Melissa Ingersoll, Ana V. Bodea-Braescu & Monique G. Lin. (2014) Foley Catheter Compared With the Controlled-Release Dinoprostone Insert. Obstetrics & Gynecology 123:6, pages 1280-1287.
Crossref
Crossref
James Andrew Smith. (2013) A simplified cervix model in response to induction balloon in pre-labour. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling 10:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Chi Eung Danforn Lim, Rachel Wai Chung Ng & Ke Xu. (2013) Non-hormonal methods for induction of labour. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology 25:6, pages 441-447.
Crossref
Crossref
L. Rossard, C. Arlicot, H. Blasco, J. Potin, C. Denis, D. Mercier & F. Perrotin. (2013) Maturation cervicale par sonde à ballonnet sur utérus cicatriciel : étude rétrospective sur trois ans. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 42:5, pages 480-487.
Crossref
Crossref